Usage Information

Synthesis of Essential Amino Acids from Their α-Keto Analogues by Perfused Rat Liver and Muscle
Mackenzie Walser, … , Neil B. Ruderman, A. W. Coulter
Mackenzie Walser, … , Neil B. Ruderman, A. W. Coulter
Published November 1, 1973
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1973;52(11):2865-2877. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107483.
View: Text | PDF | Errata
Research Article

Synthesis of Essential Amino Acids from Their α-Keto Analogues by Perfused Rat Liver and Muscle

Abstract

Most essential amino acids can be replaced by their α-keto-analogues in the diet. These ketoacids have therefore been proposed as substitutes for dietary protein. In order to determine their fate in tissues of normal animals, isolated rat liver and hindquarter (muscle) preparations were perfused with keto-analogues of valine, leucine, isoleucine, methionine, or phenylalanine. When perfused at 1.5-2.0 mM, all five compounds were utilized rapidly by the liver of 48-h starved rats, at rates varying from 49 to 155 μmol/h per 200g rat. The corresponding amino acids appeared in the medium in significantly increased concentrations. Perfusion with phenylpyruvate also led to the appearance of tyrosine. Urea release was unaltered. Measurement of metabolite concentrations in freeze-clamped liver revealed two abnormalities, particularly at ketoacid concentrations of 5 mM or above: a large increase in α-ketoglutarate, and a moderate to marked decrease in tissue glutamine. This decrease was quantitatively sufficient to account for nitrogen appearing in newly synthesized amino acids.

Authors

Mackenzie Walser, Patricia Lund, Neil B. Ruderman, A. W. Coulter

×

Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 268 2
PDF 149 28
Scanned page 516 7
Citation downloads 40 0
Totals 973 37
Total Views 1,010
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement