The present experiments were undertaken to investigate the mechanism whereby the parasympathetic nervous system may be involved in the renal regulation of solute-free water excretion. The effects of interruption of parasympathetic pathways by bilateral cervical vagotomy were examined in eight normal and seven hypophysectomized anesthetized dogs undergoing a water diuresis. In the normal animals cervical vagotomy decreased free-water clearance (CH2O) from 2.59±0.4 se to −0.26±0.1 ml/min (P < 0.001), and urinary osmolality (Uosm) increased from 86±7 to 396±60 mOsm/kg (P < 0.001). This antidiuretic effect was not associated with changes in cardiac output, renal perfusion pressure, glomerular filtration rate, renal vascular resistance, or filtration fraction and was not affected by renal denervation. A small but significant increase in urinary sodium and potassium excretion was observed after vagotomy in these normal animals. Pharmacological blockade of parasympathetic efferent pathways with atropine, curare, or both was not associated with an alteration in either renal hemodynamics or renal diluting capacity. In contrast to the results in normal animals, cervical vagotomy was not associated with an antidiuretic effect in hypophysectomized animals. CH2O was 2.29±0.26 ml/min before and 2.41±0.3 ml/min after vagotomy, and Uosm was 88±9.5 mOsm/kg before vagotomy and 78±8.6 mOsm/kg after vagotomy in the hypophysectomized animals. Changes in systemic or renal hemodynamics or electrolyte excretion were also not observed after vagotomy in these hypophysectomized animals. On the basis of these results, we conclude that the antidiuretic effect associated with cervical vagotomy is initiated by interruption of parasympathetic afferent pathways and is mediated by increased endogenous release of vasopressin. This antidiuresis was also demonstrated to occur in the absence of renal nerves and alterations in systemic and renal hemodynamics.
Robert W. Schrier, Tomas Berl, Judith A. Harbottle
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 173 | 0 |
66 | 25 | |
Scanned page | 285 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 47 | 0 |
Totals | 571 | 27 |
Total Views | 598 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.