The effects of coronary artery bypass graft (CAB) and coronary collaterals (CC) on myocardial blood flow (MBF) were studied in 24 patients undergoing 29 CAB's. MBF after CAB was compared to preexisting MBF by intraoperatively injecting 133xenon via distal CAB with proximal CAB first occluded then open. Pressure gradients across bypassed obstructions were measured. The results were correlated with preoperative coronary arteriograms to determine the effects of CC on MBF and postobstructive perfusion pressures. Mean MBF was increased by CAB from 32±6 (se) ml/min per 100 g (CAB occluded) to 118±13 ml/min per 100 g (CAB open). The 133Xe clearance curves with CAB open were resolved into slow (19±2 ml/min per 100 g) and rapid (133±12 ml/min per 100 g) phases, suggesting that MBF remained heterogeneous after CAB. Vessels with less than 80% stenosis by angiography had pressure gradients less than 20 mm Hg across obstructions, high postobstructive perfusion pressures (75±7 mm Hg), and normal MBF (87±6 ml/min per 100 g) even with CAB occluded. Vessels with greater than 80% stenosis or total occlusion by angiography had significant pressure gradients with marked reduction of postobstructive MBF. No significant difference in postobstructive MBF was found when vessels with CC (21±4 ml/min per 100 g) were compared to those without CC (17±4 ml/min per 100 g) (P > 0.4).
Sidney C. Smith Jr., Richard Gorlin, Michael V. Herman, Warren J. Taylor, John J. Collins Jr.
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 172 | 0 |
99 | 20 | |
Figure | 0 | 2 |
Scanned page | 493 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 60 | 0 |
Totals | 824 | 24 |
Total Views | 848 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.