Usage Information

Human Serum Activities against Hemophilus influenzae, Type b
Porter Anderson, … , Richard B. Johnston Jr., David H. Smith
Porter Anderson, … , Richard B. Johnston Jr., David H. Smith
Published January 1, 1972
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1972;51(1):31-38. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI106793.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Human Serum Activities against Hemophilus influenzae, Type b

Abstract

Humoral immunity to Hemophilus influenzae, type b was studied in normal human adults by means of assays for serum bactericidal and opsonizing activities against the organism and for passive hemagglutinating activity using erythrocytes sensitized with polyribophosphate, the type-specific capsular antigen. Hemagglutinating activity was detectable in about 60% of the 114 sera tested. Serum bactericidal and opsonizing activities were found in all sera tested; the levels in some sera, however, were quite low. The antibacterial activities were due not only to antibodies directed against the polyribophosphate capsule but also to antibodies that appear to be directed against somatic antigens. Type b strains differed in their susceptibility to the antisomatic antibodies of particular sera but were uniformly sensitive to anticapsular antibody.

Authors

Porter Anderson, Richard B. Johnston Jr., David H. Smith

×

Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 195 0
PDF 123 33
Scanned page 371 13
Citation downloads 52 0
Totals 741 46
Total Views 787
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement