The kinetics of blood neutrophils was investigated by means of the in vitro radioactive diisopropyl fluorophosphate method in 35 patients with a chronic, steady-state neutropenia. There were 17 patients in whom the half disappearance time of neutrophils was normal. In 10 of these patients, the production of neutrophils was low and in 7, production was normal. In 18 patients the half disappearance time of neutrophilic granulocytes was shorter than normal. The production of neutrophilic granulocytes was low in five of these patients, normal in eight patients, and increased in five. An attempt was made to correlate other laboratory measurements with the kinetic picture, but no relationship was found; the marrow neutrophil reserve as measured by endotoxin or cortisol injection; marrow cellularity on aspiration or biopsy; in vitro-labeling index with 3HTdR; or serum lysozyme concentration proved of no value in identifying the various kinetic groups. The only finding that seemed to correlate with the kinetic picture was the presence or absence of splenomegaly. In 12 of the 18 patients with a short half disappearance time, splenomegaly was present whereas in 15 of 17 patients with a normal half disappearance time, there was no splenomegaly. Of 20 patients with greater than 1000 neutrophils per mm3, 17 were found to have a normal total-blood neutrophil pool. Thus these patients, with many of their cells marginated, agree to have a “shift neutropenia.”
C. R. Bishop, G. Rothstein, H. E. Ashenbrucker, J. W. Athens
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 110 | 0 |
55 | 21 | |
Scanned page | 382 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 41 | 0 |
Totals | 588 | 25 |
Total Views | 613 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.