The site, nature, magnitude, and duration of fluid and electrolyte loss into the small intestine during the acute and recovery phase of human cholera was defined in 27 Indian patients. 11 subjects without cholera served as controls. The marker perfusion technique employed was shown, in preliminary experiments, to measure accurately jejunal and ileal fluid and electrolyte transmucosal transport rates under conditions of cholera diarrhea. Fluid loss into the lumen occurred from jejunal and ileal mucosa. The fluid was isotonic in both regions. Bicarbonate concentration was significantly higher in ileal than jejunal fluid during all phases of the disease. Bicarbonate concentration in both regions was significantly higher in acute cholera than during convalescence. Fluid loss into the intestinal lumen ranged from 0.07 to 10.9 ml/hr per cm. Losses were significantly greater from jejunum than ileum. Net ileal absorption was recorded in five of 10 acute cholera studies. During the acute phase of the disease, net jejunal fluid transport showed a positive correlation with fasting intestinal flow rate and stool output. Stool output was also positively correlated with jejunal fasting intestinal flow rates. Recovery of normal fluid and electrolyte absorptive function was usually complete in both jejunum and ileum by the sixth day after admission.
John G. Banwell, Nathaniel F. Pierce, Rupak C. Mitra, Kenneth L. Brigham, George J. Caranasos, Robert I. Keimowitz, David S. Fedson, Jacob Thomas, Sherwood L. Gorbach, R. Bradley Sack, Arabindo Mondal
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 178 | 2 |
81 | 36 | |
Scanned page | 406 | 17 |
Citation downloads | 51 | 0 |
Totals | 716 | 55 |
Total Views | 771 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.