Abnormal estrogen metabolism has been found in cirrhosis after administration of intravenous tracers of estradiol-3H to 6 patients and 23 healthy controls. The major abnormalities observed involved estrogen metabolites other than the 3 “classic” ones, i.e., estrone (E1), estradiol (E2), and estriol (E3). Urinary recovery of radioactivity was regularly elevated in the patients, to an average of 71% of the dose compared to 51% in normals. This is considered to reflect the component of intrahepatic cholestasis in cirrhosis. The per cent dose recovered as urinary glucosiduronates (42%) was normal in cirrhotics in contrast to impaired glucuronidation of cortisol metabolites in this disease. E1 and E2 were present in normal amounts, and E3 was slightly elevated to 21% of the extract compared to 14% in controls. There were strikingly decreased excretion of 2-hydroxyestrone (3% compared with normal 20%) and 2-methoxyestrone (2% compared with 5%) and increased excretion of 16α-hydroxyestrone (12% compared with normal 6%). Thus cirrhosis, too, is characterized by the reciprocal relationship between decreased 2-hydroxylation and increased 16α-hydroxylation previously described in hypothyroidism and male breast cancer. However, unlike these latter, the increase of 16α-hydroxy metabolites was less than the decrease of 2-hydroxy metabolites. The data indicate clearcut impairment of 2-hydroxylation, suggestive impairment of 16α-hydroxylation, and a definite depression of the reaction 16α-hydroxyestrone→estriol, the latter finding so far unique to cirrhosis. Demonstration of abnormal peripheral metabolism of estrogen in cirrhosis provides a new approach to the origin of the hyperestrogenic syndrome in this disease.
Barnett Zumoff, Jack Fishman, T. F. Gallagher, Leon Hellman
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 164 | 7 |
63 | 24 | |
Scanned page | 220 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 63 | 0 |
Totals | 510 | 32 |
Total Views | 542 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.