The atheroprotective effects of estrogen are well documented, but the mechanisms responsible for these effects are not well understood. To study the role of physiologic (nanomolar) estrogen levels on the arterial response-to-injury, we applied a mouse carotid artery injury model to ovariectomized C57BL/6J mice. Mice were treated with vehicle (-E2, n = 10) or 17 beta-estradiol (+E2, n = 10) for 7 d, subjected to unilateral carotid injury, and 14 d later contralateral (normal = NL) and injured carotids from -E2 and +E2 animals were pressure fixed, harvested, and analyzed by quantitative morphometry. E2 levels in +E2 mice were consistently in the nanomolar range (2.1-2.5 nM) at days 0, 7, and 14. At 14 d, measures of both intimal and medial area were markedly increased in the -E2 group: (-E2 vs NL, P < 0.05 for both), but were unchanged from normal levels in the +E2 group (+E2 vs NL, P = NS and +E2 vs -E2, P < 0.05 for both). Cellular proliferation, as assessed by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling, was significantly increased over NL in the -E2 mice, but this increase was markedly attenuated in the estrogen replacement group (total BrdU positive cells/section: NL = 6.4 +/- 4.5; -E2 = 113 +/- 26, +E2 = 40 +/- 3.7; -E2 vs NL, P < 0.05; +E2 vs NL, P = NS; -E2 vs +E2, P < 0.05). These data (a) demonstrate significant suppression of the mouse carotid response-to-injury by physiologic levels of estrogen replacement; (b) support the utility of this model in the study of the biologic effects of estrogen on the vascular-injury response; and (c) suggest a direct effect of estrogen on vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation in injured vessels.
T R Sullivan Jr, R H Karas, M Aronovitz, G T Faller, J P Ziar, J J Smith, T F O'Donnell Jr, M E Mendelsohn
Usage data is cumulative from October 2023 through October 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 260 | 0 |
101 | 34 | |
Scanned page | 313 | 17 |
Citation downloads | 52 | 0 |
Totals | 726 | 51 |
Total Views | 777 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.