Healthy adult male volunteers were immunized with purified M protein from Group A streptococci. Type 1. The vaccine was administered subcutaneously as an aluminum hydroxide-precipitated antigen in three montly doses. Control subjects received a placebo of the aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. To test the efficacy of the immunization, vaccinees and controls were challenged with a virulent strain of Type 1 streptococci applied to the pharynx. The immunization and challenge of the vaccinated and control subjects (19 men in each group) were carried out as a double blind experiment. All subjects were carefully screened by physical and laboratory examinations before and after the immunization and infectivity schedules. 30-50 days after the last injection, the vaccinees and control subjects were infected with the streptococci. Careful surveillance was maintained to evaluate the extent of acquired streptococcal infection. Throat cultures, leukocytes counts, temperatures, and physical signs and symptoms were monitored daily. All subjects received 1.2 million U of penicillin intramuscularly no later than 6 days after inoculation with the culture. Illness was judged by the appearance of exudative pharyngitis and cervical adenopathy accompanied by a positive throat culture. By these criteria, 9 of the 19 placebo controls, and 1 of 19 vaccinees were ill. No residual illness or clinical complications was observed after the penicillin treatment. It is concluded that the alum-precipitated M protein vaccine afforded protection against an upper respiratory Type 1 streptococcal infection.
Eugene N. Fox, Robert H. Waldman, Masako K. Wittner, Arthur A. Mauceri, Albert Dorfman
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 228 | 1 |
105 | 38 | |
Scanned page | 335 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 56 | 0 |
Totals | 724 | 43 |
Total Views | 767 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.