Long-acting thyroid stimulator (LATS) increased glucose oxidation and 32P incorporation into phospholipids in in vitro experiments with dog thyroid slices. The time course of the response was different from that obtained with thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), but was very similar to the delayed effect observed in vivo. During a 45 min incubation, TSH, but not LATS increased glucose oxidation, whereas in longer experiments up to 6 hr, both substances augmented 14CO2 production. Amounts of pooled human gamma globulin equivalent to LATS were inactive. Although TSH stimulated 32P incorporation into phospholipids during a 2 hr incubation, LATS was ineffective. In longer incubations, from 4½ to 8 hr, LATS did increase 32P incorporation. The stimulatory effect of LATS was not abolished by anti-TSH antibody capable of neutralizing human TSH. Effects of LATS were also obtained with beef and pig thyroid slices. In addition to stimulation of glucose oxidation in dog thyroid slices, LATS occasionally also stimulated glucose oxidation in dog spleen and liver slices. Despite a 54-fold increase in LATS concentration, a satisfactory dose-response curve could not be demonstrated when 14CO2 production was measured.
James B. Field, Adrienne Remer, Gail Bloom, Joseph P. Kriss
Usage data is cumulative from July 2023 through July 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 71 | 0 |
32 | 17 | |
Scanned page | 75 | 6 |
Citation downloads | 16 | 0 |
Totals | 194 | 23 |
Total Views | 217 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.