Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Regulation of glycolysis and the Warburg effect in wound healing
Roohi Vinaik, Dalia Barayan, Christopher Auger, Abdikarim Abdullahi, Marc G. Jeschke
Roohi Vinaik, Dalia Barayan, Christopher Auger, Abdikarim Abdullahi, Marc G. Jeschke
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Inflammation Therapeutics

Regulation of glycolysis and the Warburg effect in wound healing

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

One of the most significant adverse postburn responses is abnormal scar formation, such as keloids. Despite its prolificacy, the underlying pathophysiology of keloid development is unknown. We recently demonstrated that NLRP3 inflammasome, the master regulator of inflammatory and metabolic responses (e.g., aerobic glycolysis), is essential for physiological wound healing. Therefore, burn patients who develop keloids may exhibit altered immunometabolic responses at the site of injury, which interferes with normal healing and portends keloid development. Here, we confirmed keloid NLRP3 activation (cleaved caspase-1 [P < 0.05], IL-1β [P < 0.05], IL-18 [P < 0.01]) and upregulation in Glut1 (P < 0.001) and glycolytic enzymes. Burn skin similarly displayed enhanced glycolysis and Glut1 expression (P < 0.01). However, Glut1 was significantly higher in keloid compared with nonkeloid burn patients (>2 SD above mean). Targeting aberrant glucose metabolism with shikonin, a pyruvate kinase M2 inhibitor, dampened NLRP3-mediated inflammation (cleaved caspase-1 [P < 0.05], IL-1β [P < 0.01]) and improved healing in vivo. In summary, burn skin exhibited evidence of Warburg-like metabolism, similar to keloids. Targeting this altered metabolism could change the trajectory toward normal scarring, indicating the clinical possibility of shikonin for abnormal scar prevention.

Authors

Roohi Vinaik, Dalia Barayan, Christopher Auger, Abdikarim Abdullahi, Marc G. Jeschke

×

Figure 3

Altered glucose metabolism in keloid and burn tissue compared with normal skin.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Altered glucose metabolism in keloid and burn tissue compared with norma...
(A) Schematic depicting critical glycolytic enzymes evaluated in keloid and burn tissue. (B) Gene expression studies for GLUT1, GLUT3, HK1, HK2, PFK1, PFK2, PDK1, and PKM2 in keloid tissue compared with normal skin (left), burn skin compared with normal skin (center), and all 3 tissues (right) (n = 6–8). (C) Protein expression of Glut1 (n = 4 normal skin, n = 6 burn skin, n = 6 keloid), PKM2 (n = 5 normal skin, n = 5 burn skin, n = 6 keloid), and Hif1α (n = 5 normal skin, n = 6 burn skin, n = 6 keloid). (D) Representative cropped Western blots for Glut1, PKM2, and Hif1α. (E) Seahorse XF96 glycolysis stress test performed on fibroblasts from normal skin (n = 5), burn (n = 8), and keloid (n = 6) tissues. (F and G) Measurements of glycolysis (F) and glycolytic capacity (G) were made possible using the Seahorse XF stress test reporter generator. Values are expressed as log2 (fold change) relative to normal skin, presented as mean ± SEM. Experiments were conducted twice. Student’s t test and 1-way ANOVA; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001 keloid versus burn; #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 keloid versus normal; °P < 0.05 burn versus normal.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts