Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
VIRMA modulates function of photoreceptor cells through m6A modification and alternative splicing
Wenjing Liu, Xiaojing Wu, Rong Zou, Fan Zhang, Yudi Fan, Kuanxiang Sun, Liping Yang, Jiang Hu, Lin Zhang, Xianjun Zhu
Wenjing Liu, Xiaojing Wu, Rong Zou, Fan Zhang, Yudi Fan, Kuanxiang Sun, Liping Yang, Jiang Hu, Lin Zhang, Xianjun Zhu
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Neuroscience Ophthalmology

VIRMA modulates function of photoreceptor cells through m6A modification and alternative splicing

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification is the most prevalent posttranscriptional epigenetic modification in mammalian mRNAs, and it has been implicated in the regulation of nervous system development by modulating mRNA metabolism. VIRMA is the largest core subunit of the m6A methyltransferase complex and is essential for the assembly and stability of the m6A methyltransferase complex. In the retina, m6A methylation modification is widely distributed in various cellular layers and is essential for retinal homeostasis. Here, we demonstrate that VIRMA-mediated m6A modification is essential for retinal homeostasis. Loss of Virma in retinal rod cells resulted in abnormal reduction in m6A methylation levels, along with impaired photoreceptor function and degeneration. Mechanically, Virma depletion in photoreceptors dampened the m6A modification level of visual perception–associated genes, resulting compromised visual function and photoreceptors degeneration. Moreover, Virma interacted with splicing factor to regulate the alternative splicing events of retina function–related genes such as Polg2, which contributes to photoreceptor damage. Reintroduction of normal Virma expression colonially rescued photoreceptor degeneration. Collectively, our data elucidate the important role of Virma-mediated m6A modification in photoreceptor function and suggest that epigenetic modulation could serve as a potential target to treat these blinding diseases.

Authors

Wenjing Liu, Xiaojing Wu, Rong Zou, Fan Zhang, Yudi Fan, Kuanxiang Sun, Liping Yang, Jiang Hu, Lin Zhang, Xianjun Zhu

×

Figure 1

Impaired visual function in rod-specific Virma-depleted mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Impaired visual function in rod-specific Virma-depleted mice.
(A) Scotop...
(A) Scotopic ERGs were recorded with increasing light intensities from dark-adapted Ctrl and RKO mice at 4 weeks of age. (B) Statistical analysis for the amplitudes of the a-wave and b-wave under scotopic conditions (Student’s t test, n = 3). (C) Photopic ERGs were recorded from Ctrl and RKO mice at 4 weeks of age. (D) Statistical analysis for the amplitudes of the a-wave and b-wave under photopic conditions (Student’s t test, n = 3). (E and F) The representative traveling trajectories (E) and heatmap recordings for time spent in distinct regions (F) of the light-dark box at 2,000 lux luminance. (G) Statistical analysis based on behavioral parameters, including time, distance traveled, and duration as well as transition between the chambers (Student’s t test, n = 6). (H) Representative heatmaps of the visual stimuli–driven optomotor responses at 0.2 cycles/° spatial frequency. (I) Representative images of OMR values. The response time in either stimulus direction (positive value, light green window) or opposite direction (negative value, light magenta window) at a specific velocity threshold was normalized to the maximal response time, set as 1, and presented as a blue bar. (J) Statistical analysis of optomotor response (Student’s t test, n = 6). Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. A lack of significant difference is indicated by #.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts