Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Myokine SIRPα exacerbates kidney disease in diabetes
Jiao Wu, Elisa Russo, Daniela Verzola, Qingtian Li, Helena Zhang, Bhuvaneswari Krishnan, David Sheikh-Hamad, Zhaoyong Hu, William E. Mitch, Sandhya S. Thomas
Jiao Wu, Elisa Russo, Daniela Verzola, Qingtian Li, Helena Zhang, Bhuvaneswari Krishnan, David Sheikh-Hamad, Zhaoyong Hu, William E. Mitch, Sandhya S. Thomas
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Endocrinology Nephrology

Myokine SIRPα exacerbates kidney disease in diabetes

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Mechanisms responsible for skeletal muscle kidney crosstalk have not been defined. We have determined that a circulating mediator, signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα), impairs intracellular insulin-mediated functions. To elucidate the effect of myokine SIRPα on diabetic kidney disease (DKD), flox mice and muscle-specific (m-specific) SIRPα-KO mice were subjected to an obesity-induced model of diabetes, high-fat diet (HFD; 60%) or insulin-deficient hyperglycemia model, streptozotocin (STZ), and were subsequently exposed to anti-SIRPα monoclonal antibodies. In the obesity-induced diabetic mice, serum SIRPα increased. Genetic deletion of muscle SIRPα protected against obesity and improved intracellular insulin signaling in muscle and adipose tissue, with reduced intramuscular fat deposition when compared with flox mice on HFD. Moreover, mSIRPα-KO mice displayed enhanced kidney tubular fatty acid oxidation (FAO) expression with suppressed intraorgan triglycerides deposition, and importantly, protection against DKD. Conversely, exogenous SIRPα impaired kidney proximal tubular cell FAO, ATP production, and exacerbated fibrosis. Finally, suppressing SIRPα in skeletal muscles or treatment with anti-SIRPα monoclonal antibodies in STZ-treated mice mitigated cachexia, hyperlipidemia, kidney triglyceride deposition, and renal dysfunction in spite of significant hyperglycemia. Importantly, serum SIRPα was upregulated in patients with DKD. In conclusion, SIRPα serves as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in DKD.

Authors

Jiao Wu, Elisa Russo, Daniela Verzola, Qingtian Li, Helena Zhang, Bhuvaneswari Krishnan, David Sheikh-Hamad, Zhaoyong Hu, William E. Mitch, Sandhya S. Thomas

×

Figure 1

Blocking SIRPα in muscle prevents serum SIRPα release while improving insulin sensitivity in an obesity model of type 2 diabetes.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Blocking SIRPα in muscle prevents serum SIRPα release while improving in...
Five-week-old fl/fl, muscle-specific SIRPα-KO (mSIRPα–/–) mice were fed with high-fat diet (HFD) vs. normal chow (NC) diet for 16 weeks. (A) Serum SIRPα was confirmed by ELISA (n = 6–11). (B–D) Glucose tolerance (n = 7–10), insulin tolerance (n = 6–9), and insulin levels (after 16 hours fasting) were measured (n = 6–11). (E and F) Representative immunoblots for SIRPα, pAKT and AKT in gastrocnemius (GAS, n = 9-10) skeletal muscle and epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT, n = 6-8) are shown. The relative SIRPα to GAPDH or pAKT to AKT levels are shown. (G) Mice body weights (BW) were determined (n = 8). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance analysis was performed using 2-tailed unpaired t test for C; 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test for A, B, and G and SIRPα in F; and Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons for D and E and pAKT in F. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001 NC vs. HFD; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 fl/fl vs. mSIRPα–/–.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts