Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Lymphatic disorders caused by mosaic, activating KRAS variants respond to MEK inhibition
Sarah E. Sheppard, Michael E. March, Christoph Seiler, Leticia S. Matsuoka, Sophia E. Kim, Charlly Kao, Adam I. Rubin, Mark R. Battig, Nahla Khalek, Erica Schindewolf, Nora O’Connor, Erin Pinto, Jessica R.C. Priestley, Victoria R. Sanders, Rojeen Niazi, Arupa Ganguly, Cuiping Hou, Diana Slater, Ilona J. Frieden, Thy Huynh, Joseph T. Shieh, Ian D. Krantz, Jessenia C. Guerrero, Lea F. Surrey, David M. Biko, Pablo Laje, Leslie Castelo-Soccio, Taizo A. Nakano, Kristen Snyder, Christopher L. Smith, Dong Li, Yoav Dori, Hakon Hakonarson
Sarah E. Sheppard, Michael E. March, Christoph Seiler, Leticia S. Matsuoka, Sophia E. Kim, Charlly Kao, Adam I. Rubin, Mark R. Battig, Nahla Khalek, Erica Schindewolf, Nora O’Connor, Erin Pinto, Jessica R.C. Priestley, Victoria R. Sanders, Rojeen Niazi, Arupa Ganguly, Cuiping Hou, Diana Slater, Ilona J. Frieden, Thy Huynh, Joseph T. Shieh, Ian D. Krantz, Jessenia C. Guerrero, Lea F. Surrey, David M. Biko, Pablo Laje, Leslie Castelo-Soccio, Taizo A. Nakano, Kristen Snyder, Christopher L. Smith, Dong Li, Yoav Dori, Hakon Hakonarson
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cardiology Genetics

Lymphatic disorders caused by mosaic, activating KRAS variants respond to MEK inhibition

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Central conducting lymphatic anomaly (CCLA) due to congenital maldevelopment of the lymphatics can result in debilitating and life-threatening disease with limited treatment options. We identified 4 individuals with CCLA, lymphedema, and microcystic lymphatic malformation due to pathogenic, mosaic variants in KRAS. To determine the functional impact of these variants and identify a targeted therapy for these individuals, we used primary human dermal lymphatic endothelial cells (HDLECs) and zebrafish larvae to model the lymphatic dysplasia. Expression of the p.Gly12Asp and p.Gly13Asp variants in HDLECs in a 2‑dimensional (2D) model and 3D organoid model led to increased ERK phosphorylation, demonstrating these variants activate the RAS/MAPK pathway. Expression of activating KRAS variants in the venous and lymphatic endothelium in zebrafish resulted in lymphatic dysplasia and edema similar to the individuals in the study. Treatment with MEK inhibition significantly reduced the phenotypes in both the organoid and the zebrafish model systems. In conclusion, we present the molecular characterization of the observed lymphatic anomalies due to pathogenic, somatic, activating KRAS variants in humans. Our preclinical studies suggest that MEK inhibition should be studied in future clinical trials for CCLA due to activating KRAS pathogenic variants.

Authors

Sarah E. Sheppard, Michael E. March, Christoph Seiler, Leticia S. Matsuoka, Sophia E. Kim, Charlly Kao, Adam I. Rubin, Mark R. Battig, Nahla Khalek, Erica Schindewolf, Nora O’Connor, Erin Pinto, Jessica R.C. Priestley, Victoria R. Sanders, Rojeen Niazi, Arupa Ganguly, Cuiping Hou, Diana Slater, Ilona J. Frieden, Thy Huynh, Joseph T. Shieh, Ian D. Krantz, Jessenia C. Guerrero, Lea F. Surrey, David M. Biko, Pablo Laje, Leslie Castelo-Soccio, Taizo A. Nakano, Kristen Snyder, Christopher L. Smith, Dong Li, Yoav Dori, Hakon Hakonarson

×

Figure 3

In vitro organoid model.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
In vitro organoid model.
(A) Lymphatic organoids were transduced with KR...
(A) Lymphatic organoids were transduced with KRAS WT, KRAS p.Gly12Asp, or KRAS p.G13D and treated with DMSO (control), 1 μM binimetinib, 3 μM binimetinib, 10 μM binimetinib, or 300 nM trametinib. Scale bars: 300 μm. (B) Quantitation of sprouting data from 3 independent experiments showing cumulative sprout length per sphere (top), mean sprout length per sphere (middle), and number of sprouts per sphere (bottom). In the box and whisker plots, the center line is the median, the lower and upper boundaries of the box are the 25% and 75% quartiles, and the whiskers extend to 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25% and 75% quartiles. Two-sided Student’s t tests were performed to calculate significance. Comparisons were made between DMSO-treated WT and both DMSO-treated mutants, as well as each DMSO-treated mutant and all the drug treatments of that mutant; P values were corrected for multiple testing with the Benjamini and Hochberg FDR method. Bin, binimetinib; Tram, trametinib. (C) IB from in vitro organoid model. Cell lysates from HDLECs transduced with either KRAS WT, p.Gly12Asp, or p.Gly13Asp were analyzed with IB for pERK at T202 and Y204 or pS6 at S235/236 with actin as control and quantified. (D) Quantification of IB from 4 separate experiments, pERK or pS6 normalized to actin, normalized to WT + DMSO sample. Bars are means; error bars are SDs. Bin, binimetinib; Tram, trametinib.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts