Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
CSF1/CSF1R signaling mediates malignant pleural effusion formation
Chrysavgi N. Kosti, Photene C. Vaitsi, Apostolos G. Pappas, Marianthi P. Iliopoulou, Katherina K. Psarra, Sophia F. Magkouta, Ioannis T. Kalomenidis
Chrysavgi N. Kosti, Photene C. Vaitsi, Apostolos G. Pappas, Marianthi P. Iliopoulou, Katherina K. Psarra, Sophia F. Magkouta, Ioannis T. Kalomenidis
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Angiogenesis Oncology

CSF1/CSF1R signaling mediates malignant pleural effusion formation

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is an incurable common manifestation of many malignancies. Its formation is orchestrated by complex interactions among tumor cells, inflammatory cells, and the vasculature. Tumor-associated macrophages present the dominant inflammatory population of MPE, and M2 macrophage numbers account for dismal prognosis. M2 polarization is known to be triggered by CSF1/CSF1 receptor (CSF1R) signaling. We hypothesized that CSF1R+ M2 macrophages favor MPE formation and could be therapeutically targeted to limit MPE. We generated mice with CSF1R-deficient macrophages and induced lung and colon adenocarcinoma–associated MPE. We also examined the therapeutic potential of a clinically relevant CSF1R inhibitor (BLZ945) in lung and colon adenocarcinoma–induced experimental MPE. We showed that CSF1R+ macrophages promoted pleural fluid accumulation by enhancing vascular permeability, destabilizing tumor vessels, and favoring immune suppression. We also showed that CSF1R inhibition limited MPE in vivo by reducing vascular permeability and neoangiogenesis and impeding tumor progression. This was because apart from macrophages, CSF1R signals in cancer-associated fibroblasts leading to macrophage inflammatory protein 2 secretion triggered the manifestation of suppressive and angiogenic properties in macrophages upon CXCR2 paracrine activation. Pharmacological targeting of the CSF1/CSF1R axis can therefore be a vital strategy for limiting MPE.

Authors

Chrysavgi N. Kosti, Photene C. Vaitsi, Apostolos G. Pappas, Marianthi P. Iliopoulou, Katherina K. Psarra, Sophia F. Magkouta, Ioannis T. Kalomenidis

×

Figure 7

Suppressive effects of CAFs on macrophages are mediated through CAF-derived MIP2 expression mediated through macrophage MIP2 receptor.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Suppressive effects of CAFs on macrophages are mediated through CAF-deri...
(A and B) Isolated CAFs with inherent (vCAFs) or silenced MIP2 expression (shMIP2 CAFs) and bone marrow–derived macrophages with inherent (macrophage vector) or silenced MIP2 receptor (macrophage shCXCR2) were used to repeat the setting described in Figure 6C. (A and B) CD45+CD11b+F4/80+macrophages were analyzed for IL-12/IL-10 ratio expression using flow cytometry and (C and D) tumor cells were counted using BCECF-AM measurement. Data presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4 for all groups (2 independent experiments). *P < 0.05 compared with indicated group by 1-way ANOVA (with Tukey’s post hoc test).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts