Murine models of Omenn syndrome

In the 40 years since Harvard medical student Gilbert Omenn first described a rare, inherited disorder producing a paradoxical combination of immunodeficiency and immune dysregulation, the pathogenesis of Omenn syndrome (OS) has remained mysterious. In separate studies reported in this issue of the JCI, two mouse models bearing mutations in the V(D)J recombinase analogous to those causing human OS have been shown to recapitulate the disease and provide insight into the genesis of immunodeficiency combined with autoimmunity and atopy in OS and other disease settings (see the related articles beginning on pages 1260 and 1270).

Omenn syndrome (OS) is differentiated from SCID by the additional features of autoimmunity and atopy, which signify substantial immune dysregulation (1–4). Although the clinical picture of OS is variable, patients typically present in infancy with erythroderma, alopecia, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, chronic diarrhea, failure to thrive, and recurrent infections. Peripheral blood analyses reveal eosinophilia, severely decreased B cell counts, and hypogammaglobulinemia, but markedly elevated IgE levels. Although T cell counts are normal to elevated, T cells display a highly restricted, oligoclonal TCR repertoire (ref. 3 and references therein). When left untreated, OS is fatal, usually as a result of infections; the available therapies, bone marrow and cord blood stem cell transplantation, are variably successful (2, 4).

OS can be caused by any of several genetic defects that impair lymphocyte development. Mutations affecting (a) thymic development (resulting in atypical DiGeorge syndrome); (b) cytokine receptors required for T cell development (e.g., IL-7 receptor deficiency); or (c) mitochondrial RNA processing (e.g., the RNA component of mitochondrial RNA processing endoribonuclease gene, RMRP) have been reported (3, 5). The best-characterized defects, however, are homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in either Rag1 or Rag2, which together encode the protein complex that catalyzes V(D)J recombination (6). This process, whereby DNA rearrangements at the TCR and Ig gene loci create a diverse repertoire of receptors, is required for lymphocyte development. The Rag mutations seen in OS are characteristically hypomorphic, partially disabling the activity of the V(D)J recombinase (hypomorphic mutations in Artemis, a DNA repair gene crucial for V(D)J recombination, can also cause OS; ref. 3). In contrast to severe, inactivating mutations in the Rag genes that lead to SCID, a hypomorphic V(D)J recombinase that is able to generate only a few productive antigen receptor gene rearrangements accounts for the immunodeficiency and oligoclonal repertoire in OS (7, 8).

A compelling explanation for the connection between a severely constrained TCR repertoire and the atopic/autoimmune features of OS has proven elusive. Pathogenesis is likely multifactorial. The involvement of modifying genes and epigenetic influences have been suggested (8), although no supporting evidence has yet emerged. Exposure to foreign antigens could also play a role: antigenic stimulation from recurrent infections could facilitate expansion of lymphocyte clones, including some with self reactivity (7–9). This idea is supported by the observation that a patient with T^–B^– SCID progressed to OS following a parainfluenza virus infection (10). Iatrogenic components, including prolonged courses of antibiotic and immunosuppressive therapy, could also influence the development or phenotypic expression of OS (8). One possible scenario is that these treatments alter the commensal microbial flora, thought to be important for immunologic tolerance by affecting the development of a functional Treg compartment (11). A peripheral imbalance of Tregs has also been mentioned as a possible cause of the loss of tolerance in OS (2, 3). Most recently, diminished expression of autoimmune regulator (AIRE) was found in the thymi of patients with OS, suggesting a mechanism for the impairment of negative selection (2, 12). The lack of an animal model for OS has hindered analysis of the contributions by these factors to the disease. Now, in this issue of the JCI, two groups have characterized two mouse models that recapitulate key features of human OS.

In the first report, Marella et al. (13) created knockin mice bearing a Rag2 mutation (R229Q) identified in several OS patients, including those in families with histories of both OS and SCID (8, 9). B and T lymphocyte precursors were arrested in early developmental stages, consistent with a previous finding that a mutation in the same residue, R229A, severely reduces recombination activity in transfected cells (14). Sixty percent of the homozygous mice developed alopecia; a small percentage of the mice also developed severe erythroderma and a wasting syndrome, replicating important features of human OS. Regardless of severity of clinical manifestations, all Rag2 R229Q mutant mice displayed abnormal architecture of the thymus, lymph nodes, and spleen, consistent with known OS pathology, as well as restricted TCR repertoires, eosinophilia, and hypogammaglobulinemia; only some mice developed hyper-IgE syndrome. Notably, Marella et al. observed that Aire expression in thymi was low in mutant mice and that the proportion of Foxp3⁺ Tregs was diminished, offering important clues as to the defects in central and peripheral tolerance in OS (13).

Independently, Khiong and colleagues (15) discovered a spontaneous Rag1 mutation (R972Q), identical to a mutation found in an OS patient (8), that resulted in elevated memory-type T cell numbers in a C57BL/10 mouse. Development of lymphocyte precursors in homozygous Rag1 R972Q mutant mice was arrested, consistent with the severe DNA cleavage defect in vitro of a similar mutant (R972A) (16). The authors noted pronounced skin redness (though without immune infiltrates), eosinophilia, elevated IgE levels, oligoclonal T cells, and pathology of thymus, lymph nodes, and spleen. At 25 weeks the mice developed hepatosplenomegaly. It is interesting that, unlike most OS patients, the mice developed elevated IgM, IgG2a, and IgG2b levels (15). Importantly, Khiong et al. address the mechanism underlying atopy in OS: the Rag1 R972Q mutant mice have increased secretion of Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-6, and the hyper-IgE phenotype is dependent on these cytokines and on CD4⁺ T cells (15). In addition, the lymphoid compartment of the Rag1 R972Q mutant mice is primed for lymphocyte expansion, as wild-type donor CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells expanded in mutant, but not wild-type, mice (15). This implies that homeostatic proliferation, also known as lymphopenia-induced proliferation, is important for OS pathogenesis, a conclusion supported by the presence of surface activation markers on T cells in the mutant mice and in humans with OS (2, 3, 13, 15).

We have integrated these findings into a comprehensive model for OS (Figure 1). Notably, both studies (13, 15) demonstrate that OS can develop in a controlled, specific pathogen–free environment; these observations suggest that variation in phenotypic expression of this disease is not solely due to environmental influences.

Figure 1

Schematic for the development of immunodeficiency and allergy/autoimmunity in OS. (A) Normally, V(D)J recombination is competent to produce a diverse repertoire of TCR molecules. In the thymus, normal selection processes are intact, and in the periphery, unimpeded lymphocyte development and handling of antigenic stimulation result in an immunocompetent individual. (B) In OS, genetic defects result in a restricted TCR repertoire and lymphopenia. A disrupted thymic environment, directly or indirectly caused by genetic defects, contributes to the loss of central tolerance. In the periphery, lymphopenia and IL-7 receptor (IL-7R) deficiency result in prolonged or abnormal homeostatic proliferation, which may result in Th2 skewing and loss of peripheral tolerance. In this issue of the JCI, Khiong et al. (15) implicate homeostatically proliferating T cells as a cause of Th2 skewing in a mutant mouse model of OS. Also in this issue, Marella et al. (13) show that in a mutant mouse model of OS, there is a decreased proportion of Foxp3⁺ Tregs in peripheral lymphoid organs. Other factors, including genetic, epigenetic, environmental, and iatrogenic factors, may influence disease development at any or all stages. The involvement of a severely restricted B cell repertoire remains unexplained in OS and is not depicted here.

This model assumes conditions that diminish the generation of lymphocytes yet allow a few clones to be generated, resulting in lymphopenia and associated restricted T and B cell repertoire diversity (17). This is the case in OS patients — and mice — with hypomorphic RAG mutations and is consistent with other genetic causes of OS that critically limit the generation of lymphocytes. The stochastic nature of TCR and Ig rearrangements assures that no two individuals have the same antigen receptor repertoire. This influences the phenotypic expression of OS because the clones available for expansion in a given individual, combined with the individual’s immunologic experience, should determine the incidence of autoreactivity and perhaps the number of Tregs. Such a model provides an explanation for the variability of clinical features expressed by OS patients, or mice, bearing the same mutant allele. It also predicts that the Treg repertoire is restricted in the OS mice, although this was not addressed by either study.

In this model, central tolerance is impaired by disruption of the thymic microenvironment, which is caused by deficient thymic development in atypical DiGeorge syndrome or by low throughput of thymocytes secondary to crippled V(D)J recombination or IL-7 receptor deficiency. Altered thymic architecture and concomitant decreased Aire expression in the thymic medullary epithelium result in a failure of negative selection, allowing the survival of autoreactive T cell clones and a reduction of centrally derived Tregs (13).

Abnormal conditions in the periphery may also promote immune dysregulation in OS. The genetic mutations that underlie OS result in lymphopenia (18, 19), which activates compensatory proliferation of peripheral T cells. This in turn involves self-MHC interactions and production of cytokines (IL-7, IL-15, and IL-21) and, likely, Tregs (20, 21). Indeed, Khiong et al. demonstrate that T cell expansion is favored in their mutant mice (15). It has been suggested that prolonged lymphopenia-induced homeostatic proliferation causes expansion of a few self-reactive clones with effector/memory-like phenotypes, as found in humans and mice with OS (18). A negative balance of Tregs, as found by Marella et al. (13), may further account for the loss of peripheral tolerance.

Regarding the allergic features of OS, experiments using the Rag1 mutant mice implicate proliferating T cells in the development of hyper-IgE secretion in OS (15). Others have suggested that homeostatic proliferation in OS generates Th2-skewed cells, and a restricted T cell repertoire can cause Th2-skewed multiorgan symptoms in lymphopenic mice (20, 22). Intrinsic defects in B cells may also facilitate atopy in OS. Mutant RAG proteins might create a deficit in receptor editing, in which Ig gene rearrangements encoding autoreactive receptors are revised by peripheral V(D)J recombination, allowing the persistence of autoantibody-producing B cells (23). Increased antigenic stimulation caused by inefficient foreign antigen removal, elevated levels of IL-4, and increased cell cycling could give rise to Th2 skewing and IgE switching (ref. 20 and references therein). Finally, germinal centers in OS mice are dysmorphic and have few mature B cells, thereby creating an immature germinal center phenotype, which favors IgE production (24).

Khiong et al. (15) and Marella et al. (13) establish their Rag mutant mice as valid murine models for OS. Future studies of these mice may clarify the source of the phenotypic variation in OS, distinguishing the contributions of environmental, genetic, and perhaps epigenetic factors. It may be useful to look for additional phenotypic abnormalities, such as the possible involvement of other organs and the fate of γδ T cells. Moreover, differences between OS presentations in humans and mice and between the two mouse models should be investigated, such as the Th1 skewing upon stimulation in the Rag2 R229Q mutant mice; the elevated IgM, IgG2a, and IgG2b in the Rag1 R972Q mutant mice; and the delayed disease onset in the OS mice (around 8 weeks of age — young adulthood for a mouse — as opposed to infancy in a human).

These murine models for OS constitute powerful tools with which to study the mechanisms underlying this complex and fascinating disease and may facilitate development of new therapeutic approaches. Finally, studies using these animals may illuminate the pathogenesis of other disorders characterized by combinations of immunodeficiency and autoimmunity: other primary immunodeficiencies, such as common variable immunodeficiency and Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome; various autoimmune diseases; and some cases of HIV infection (2, 18, 21).

We thank Giulia Celli, Carlos E. Tadokoro, Vicky Brandt, Jennifer Posey, Rohit Chandwani, and the members of the Roth laboratory for their support and thoughtful critique of this commentary.

Address correspondence to: David B. Roth, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 540 First Avenue, Lab 2-10, New York, New York 10016, USA. Phone: (212) 263-0945; Fax: (212) 263-5711; E-mail: roth@saturn.med.nyu.edu.

Nonstandard abbreviations used: AIRE, autoimmune regulator; OS, Omenn syndrome.

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Reference information: J. Clin. Invest.117:1213–1216 (2007). doi:10.1172/JCI32214.

See the related articles at Homeostatically proliferating CD4⁺ T cells are involved in the pathogenesis of an Omenn syndrome murine model and A hypomorphic R229Q Rag2 mouse mutant recapitulates human Omenn syndrome.

1. Omenn, G.S. 1965. Familial reticuloendotheliosis with eosinophilia. N. Engl. J. Med. 273:427-432.
   View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
2. Notarangelo, L.D., Gambineri, E., Badolato, R. 2006. Immunodeficiencies with autoimmune consequences. Adv. Immunol. 89:321-370.
   View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
3. Honig, M., Schwarz, K. 2006. Omenn syndrome: a lack of tolerance on the background of deficient lymphocyte development and maturation. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 18:383-388.
   View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
4. Aleman, K., Noordzij, J.G., de Groot, R., van Dongen, J.J., Hartwig, N.G. 2001. Reviewing Omenn syndrome. Eur. J. Pediatr. 160:718-725.
   View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
5. Roifman, C.M., Gu, Y., Cohen, A. 2006. Mutations in the RNA component of RNase mitochondrial RNA processing might cause Omenn syndrome. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 117:897-903.
   View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
6. Sobacchi, C., Marrella, V., Rucci, F., Vezzoni, P., Villa, A. 2006. RAG-dependent primary immunodeficiencies. Hum. Mutat. 27:1174-1184.
   View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
7. Villa, A., et al. 1998. Partial V(D)J recombination activity leads to Omenn syndrome. Cell. 93:885-896.
   View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
8. Villa, A., et al. 2001. V(D)J recombination defects in lymphocytes due to RAG mutations: severe immunodeficiency with a spectrum of clinical presentations. Blood. 97:81-88.
   View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
9. Corneo, B., et al. 2001. Identical mutations in RAG1 or RAG2 genes leading to defective V(D)J recombinase activity can cause either T-B-severe combined immune deficiency or Omenn syndrome. Blood. 97:2772-2776.
   View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
10. Dalal, I., et al. 2005. Evolution of a T-B- SCID into an Omenn syndrome phenotype following parainfluenza 3 virus infection. Clin. Immunol. 115:70-73.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
11. Ostman, S., Rask, C., Wold, A.E., Hultkrantz, S., Telemo, E. 2006. Impaired regulatory T cell function in germ-free mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 36:2336-2346.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
12. Cavadini, P., et al. 2005. AIRE deficiency in thymus of 2 patients with Omenn syndrome. J. Clin. Invest. 115:728-732.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed Google Scholar
13. Marrella, V., et al. 2007. A hypomorphic R229Q Rag2 mouse mutant recapitulates human Omenn syndrome. J. Clin. Invest. 117:1260-1269.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed Google Scholar
14. Qiu, J.X., Kale, S.B., Yarnell Schultz, H., Roth, D.B. 2001. Separation-of-function mutants reveal critical roles for RAG2 in both the cleavage and joining steps of V(D)J recombination. Mol. Cell. 7:77-87.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
15. Khiong, K., et al. 2007. Homeostatically proliferating CD4⁺ T cells are involved in the pathogenesis of an Omenn syndrome murine model. J. Clin. Invest. 117:1270-1281.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed Google Scholar
16. Lu, C.P., Sandoval, H., Brandt, V.L., Rice, P.A., Roth, D.B. 2006. Amino acid residues in Rag1 crucial for DNA hairpin formation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13:1010-1015.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
17. Min, B., Foucras, G., Meier-Schellersheim, M., Paul, W.E. 2004. Spontaneous proliferation, a response of naive CD4 T cells determined by the diversity of the memory cell repertoire. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:3874-3879.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
18. Baccala, R., Theofilopoulos, A.N. 2005. The new paradigm of T-cell homeostatic proliferation-induced autoimmunity. Trends Immunol. 26:5-8.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
19. Curotto de Lafaille, M.A., Shen, S., Olivares-Villagomez, D., Camps-Ramirez, M., Lafaille, J.J. 2005. Do regulatory T cells play a role in the control of homeostatic proliferation? Int. Rev. Immunol. 24:269-284.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
20. Curotto de Lafaille, M.A., Lafaille, J.J. 2004. The role of regulatory T cells in allergy. Springer Semin. Immunopathol. 25:295-310.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
21. Krupica (Jr.), T., Fry, T.J., Mackall, C.L. 2006. Autoimmunity during lymphopenia: a two-hit model. Clin. Immunol. 120:121-128.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
22. Milner, J.D., Ward, J.M., Keane-Myers, A., Paul, W.E. 2007. Lymphopenic mice reconstituted with limited repertoire T cells develop severe, multiorgan, Th2-associated inflammatory disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:576-581.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
23. Jankovic, M., Casellas, R., Yannoutsos, N., Wardemann, H., Nussenzweig, M.C. 2004. RAGs and regulation of autoantibodies. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 22:485-501.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
24. Aalberse, R.C., Platts-Mills, T.A. 2004. How do we avoid developing allergy: modifications of the TH2 response from a B-cell perspective. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 113:983-986.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar