Neuronal injury: folate to the rescue?

Abstract

Strong epidemiological evidence indicates that derangement of single-carbon metabolism has detrimental effects for proper CNS functioning. Conversely, a role for folate supplementation in the treatment and prevention of neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders remains to be established. In this issue of the JCI, in an elegant series of experiments in rodents, Iskandar and colleagues demonstrate a crucial role of folate in the regeneration of afferent spinal neurons after injury. Probing sequential steps in folate metabolism, from cellular entry to DNA methylation, the authors show that axonal regeneration relies upon the integrity of DNA methylation pathways. These findings provide the first demonstration of an epigenetic mechanism contributing to neurorepair and suggest that manipulation of the methylation milieu may offer promising new therapeutic avenues to promote regeneration.

Folic acid, also referred to as folate (the anion form) or vitamin B9, plays a central role in single-carbon metabolism. Specifically, in a reaction dependent on vitamin B12, N5-methyltetrahydrofolate acts as a one-carbon donor in the remethylation of homocysteine to methionine. Dietary intake of methionine as such is insufficient to provide enough methyl groups that are required for cellular methylation reactions. Therefore, the body has to rely on the folate-dependent de novo generation of methyl groups via the single-carbon pool. Methionine is further converted to S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), which was discovered in 1953 as the “active methionine” by Catoni (1). The methyl moiety attached to the sulfur atom in SAM is chemically reactive. This explains why SAM is able to serve as the principal methyl donor in most biological transmethylation reactions (e.g., methylation of nucleic acids, proteins, or lipids). The transfer of the methyl group of SAM to an acceptor yields S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH). Dietary folate deficiency therefore confers a strong decrease in the ratio of SAM to SAH. The ratio of these two compounds regulates the balance of many cellular methylation reactions, not least that of genomic DNA. Accordingly, DNA hypomethylation has been demonstrated experimentally as a consequence of dietary folate deficiency (2).

As a water-soluble vitamin, folate cannot be stored in large amounts in the body. The special importance of folate for CNS functioning is evidenced by the fact that in deficiency states, the brain is relatively spared from folate deficiency as compared with other tissues (3). Uptake of folate across the blood-CSF barrier is primarily accomplished via membrane-bound folate receptors. Autoantibodies against these receptors may lead to cerebral folate deficiency syndrome, a pediatric neurological disorder characterized by psychomotor retardation, cerebellar ataxia, seizures, and low CSF levels of methyltetrahydrofolate (4). By now, solid evidence has also been assembled that establishes an association between folate metabolism and neural tube defects (5), although underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. Furthermore, low folate status and hyperhomocysteinemia have been implicated as potentially reversible risk factors for cerebrovascular disease, cognitive decline in the elderly, Alzheimer disease, and depression (reviewed in ref. 6).

In this issue of the JCI, Iskandar and colleagues link folate status to an epigenetic mechanism of CNS de- and regeneration in rodents (7). An epigenetic trait has been defined as “a stably inherited phenotype resulting from changes in a chromosome without alterations in the DNA sequence” (8). DNA methylation is a major epigenetic mechanism central to regulation of gene transcription, chromatin structure, imprinting, development, and genomic stability in general. In higher organisms, a methyl moiety is preferentially, albeit not exclusively, targeted to the DNA base cytosine in the context of a CpG dinucleotide. In mammals, DNA is highly methylated in CpG sequences (>50%). DNA methylation is associated with a condensed structure and transcriptional repression. It is believed to have originated as a host defense mechanism for silencing parasitic DNA elements such as transposons and retrotransposons. The agouti mouse model provides a fascinating demonstration of the importance of methyl donors, including folic acid, in development: early methyl donor nutrition during pregnancy causes methylation and thereby silencing of a retrotransposon, with silencing of the nearby agouti gene altering fur color in the offspring (9). DNA methylation is catalyzed by DNA nucleotide methyltransferases (DNMTs). DNMT1 serves as a “maintenance” methyltransferase and accordingly shows 30- to 40-fold preference for hemimethylated sites (10). In contrast, DNMT3A and DNMT3B serve as de novo methyltransferases.

Altered patterns of DNA methylation, in particular hypomethylation of growth-promoting genes and hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes, have become a common theme in cancer biology. Additionally, several single-gene disorders of the epigenetic machinery have been uncovered. Rett syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations of methyl CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2), which regulates the expression of a wide variety of genes (11). Immunodeficiency/centromeric instability/facial anomalies (ICF) syndrome involves mutations in DNMT3B and is also associated with variable degrees of mental retardation (12). Another striking example of an epigenetic mechanism operating in the brain is the effect of maternal behavior on DNA methylation at a glucocorticoid receptor gene promoter in the hippocampus of rat pups (13). Considering that epigenetics is central to phenotypic variation, understanding and modifying the epigenome holds great promise for the treatment and prevention of human disease.

Spinal cord injury, the folate pathway, and DNA methylation

Iskandar et al. investigated the consequences of sharp transection injuries on folate metabolism in rodents (7). Figure 1 provides an overview of the major experimental results. To sever primary somatosensory axons, the cervical dorsal column was lesioned. Additionally, transection of the sciatic nerve corresponded to injury of peripheral axons. Four days after injury, the authors found a 2-fold increase in the percentage of cells expressing the α-isoform of folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) and a 6-fold increase in the percentage of cells immunostaining for FOLR1. Interestingly, low extracellular folate concentration has been shown to induce folate receptor expression in human cultured cells (14). The folate receptor is a polypeptide that binds folate with high affinity. In contrast, the reduced folate carrier (RFC) is characterized by a significantly lower affinity for folic acid (15). Iskandar et al. found minimal change in Rfc1 mRNA expression and protein levels in the injured animals as compared with uninjured controls (7). Three days after cord injury, the SAM/SAH ratio (see above) had declined by approximately 50%. Consistent with the rise in SAH, a methionine synthase (MS) activity assay of spinal cord after transection injury revealed reduced enzymatic activity, whereas MS protein levels observed on Western blots did not change. Following spinal cord injury, no effects on DNMT1 protein levels were observed. However, DNMT3A and DNMT3B protein levels were strongly suppressed after cord injury. Finally, three days after sharp injury, global DNA methylation was significantly decreased.

Figure 1

Role of folate in axonal regeneration. The figure summarizes the sequence of events reported in this issue of the JCI by Iskandar et al. (7) that underlie the proregenerative effects of folate on injured CNS tissue in their rodent models. Experimental manipulations that can block this pathway at specific steps are shown on the left. Following transection injury to the CNS, increased expression of FOLR1 promotes folate uptake. Folate is then reduced to tetrahydrofolate (THF) by DHFR. Methyl-THF is required for the regeneration of SAM, which in turn promotes methylation of spinal cord DNA. Sufficient DNA methylation is crucial for axonal regeneration. 5-AzaC, 5-azacytidine.

Next, the authors assessed the therapeutic effects of folate in the spinal cord and optic pathways (7). After transection injury, an autologous sciatic nerve graft was implanted at the injury site (i.e., spinal cord or optic stump, respectively). The other end of the graft was allowed to lie freely under the skin. After an interval of time sufficient to allow growth of axons into the graft, the end of the graft was filled with the retrograde neuronal tracer hydroxystilbamidine (Fluoro-Gold). Fluorescently labeled cells were then quantified in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) or retina, respectively. Folate supplementation of wild-type animals produced a strong increase in the percentage of regenerating spinal neurons and of regenerating retinal ganglion cells relative to wild-type animals without folate treatment. This proregenerative effect of folic acid was abrogated in Folr1^+/– heterozygous mice, suggesting that increased expression of FOLR1 subsequent to axonal damage is critical to folate-mediated neuroregeneration.

Dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) catalyzes the reduction of folate to dihydrofolate and then further to tetrahydrofolate. To determine whether the propitious effects of folate depended on its initial bioactivation, Iskandar and colleagues repeated the optic nerve and spinal cord lesion experiments in animals pretreated with DHFR antagonist methotrexate (MTX) (7). Again, DHFR inhibition abrogated the proregenerative effects of folate. In addition, the authors used nitrous oxide (N₂O), which irreversibly inactivates MS, to determine whether the integrity of the single-carbon cycle is necessary for the beneficial effects of folate. Again, in animals breathing N₂O, neuronal regeneration decreased to baseline levels in both injury models. Finally, the authors demonstrated that after spinal cord injury, folic acid treatment restored de novo DNMT3A and DNMT3B protein expression. Importantly, DNMT agonism promoted, and DNMT antagonism inhibited, growth of injured sensory spinal axons into the nerve graft.

Interestingly, the authors found an inverted U-shaped relationship between the therapeutic effect of folic acid and the dose administered, with peak therapeutic effects observed at 80 μg/kg (7). A similar biphasic increase and subsequent decrease in spinal cord global methylation was observed in response to increasing doses of folate. Notably, the magnitude of de novo DNMT protein expression also followed an inverted U-shaped pattern over the dose range of folic acid treatment.

Therapeutic implications and future perspectives

Clinically, the central message of the current study by Iskandar et al. is the hope that modification of the methylation milieu may aid in the therapy of the injured CNS via an epigenetic mechanism (7). As a corollary, the authors show that cellular damage begets methyl-group deficiency, so the cell responding to an injury is no longer able to maintain its prior level of DNA methylation. Importantly, contrary to the commonly accepted model, DNA methylation as such has recently been shown to be a reversible biological phenomenon (16). In line with these results, [3^H]methyl group incorporation has been shown to increase in the injured mouse brain after transient brain ischemia (17). Similarly, hypoxia has been demonstrated to cause DNA hypomethylation (18). DNA damage and repair, cell proliferation, and cell cycle reentry of postmitotic cells may all contribute to injury-induced DNA undermethylation. Furthermore, cellular stress and subsequent oxygen radical formation may result in replacement of DNA base guanine with the oxygen radical adduct 8-hydroxyguanine, which has been shown to profoundly alter methylation of adjacent cytosines (19).

Although the focus here is on the role of folate in epigenetic regulation, the complete picture is no doubt considerably more complex. In particular, it should be noted that functional methyl-group deficiency may also exert direct genetic effects. Methyl-group deficiency leads to the depletion of thymidine triphosphate (dTTP) levels, whereas levels of deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP) increase (20). Large quantities of dUTP may be incorporated instead of dTTP during S-phase (or DNA repair). Although the resulting A:U mismatches do not produce mutations, they may hamper recognition by DNA-binding proteins and thereby perturb physiological function. Furthermore, low levels of genomic uracil may be generated during DNA repair or directly via deamination of cytosines. The resulting G:U mismatches are premutagenic and, if left unrepaired, lead to GC→AT transition mutations (21). Importantly, under conditions of reduced SAM availability, DNMTs may catalyze cytosine deamination in double-stranded DNA (22). Along these lines, we have previously demonstrated that prolonged folate deficiency leads to neurodegeneration in the absence of efficient uracil excision repair (23).

The precise cellular targets for the regenerative actions of folic acid also remain to be elucidated. The beneficial effects of folate supplementation may well extend beyond effects on neurons. Equally important, the influence of folate supplementation on the formation of the glial scar (which consists predominantly of reactive astrocytes and proteoglycans and forms after CNS tissue damage, possibly retarding regeneration) deserves further study. Of note, reactive glia may secrete a variety of growth-inhibitory factors that chemically prevent axonal extension. Additionally, folate effects on glial cells within the graft (e.g., Schwann cells) should not be discounted. Importantly, an epigenetic process involving histone deacetylation has recently been shown to participate in myelin repair (24). Finally, it will be important to define specific molecular targets. This may also help to unravel the biochemical basis for the biphasic curve of folic acid dose–dependent DNA methylation and spinal cord regeneration as shown by Iskandar et al. (7).

In conclusion, the safety and simplicity of folate supplementation in conjunction with the strength of the effects observed in the study by Iskandar and colleagues (7) call for clinical investigations of folate supplementation in patients with spinal cord and neurotrauma. Although clinical evidence is still largely lacking, folate may also have a role in the primary prevention and treatment of neurodegenerative disorders such as dementia and stroke.

Acknowledgments

The authors receive funding from the VolkswagenStiftung (Lichtenberg program), Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Center for Stroke Research Berlin), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (ExcellenceCluster NeuroCure and SFB-TR43), and the European Union (ARISE, grant agreement no. Health-F2-2008-201024 and EuStroke, grant agreement no. Health-F2-2008-202213).

Address correspondence to: Matthias Endres, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany. Phone: 49.30.450.560.102; Fax: 49.30.450.560.932; E-mail: matthias.endres@charite.de.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Citation for this article: J Clin Invest. 2010;120(5):1383–1386. doi:10.1172/JCI40764.

See the related article at Folate regulation of axonal regeneration in the rodent central nervous system through DNA methylation.

References

1. Catoni GL. S-Adenosylmethionine: a new intermediate formed enzymatically from L-methionine and adenosine triphosphate. J Biol Chem. 1953;204(1):403–416.
   View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
2. Balaghi M, Wagner C. DNA methylation in folate deficiency: use of CpG methylase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;193(3):1184–1190.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
3. Spector R. Micronutrient homeostasis in mammalian brain and cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurochem. 1989;53(6):1667–1674.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
4. Ramaekers VT, et al. Autoantibodies to folate receptors in the cerebral folate deficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(19):1985–1991.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
5. Blom HJ, Shaw GM, den Heijer M, Finnell RH. Neural tube defects and folate: case far from closed. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7(9):724–731.
   View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
6. Kronenberg G, Colla M, Endres M. Folic acid, neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disease. Curr Mol Med. 2009;9(3):315–323.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
7. Iskandar BJ, et al. Folate regulation of axonal regeneration in the rodent central nervous system through DNA methylation. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(5):1603–1616.
   View this article via: JCI Google Scholar
8. Berger SL, Kouzarides T, Shiekhattar R, Shilatifard A. An operational definition of epigenetics. Genes Dev. 2009;23(7):781–783.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
9. Waterland RA, Jirtle RL. Transposable elements: targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(15):5293–5300.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
10. Jeltsch A. On the enzymatic properties of Dnmt1: specificity, processivity, mechanism of linear diffusion and allosteric regulation of the enzyme. Epigenetics. 2006;1(2):63–66.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
11. Chahrour M, et al. MeCP2, a key contributor to neurological disease, activates and represses transcription. Science. 2008;320(5880):1224–1229.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
12. Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA, Li E. DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell. 1999;99(3):247–257.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
13. Weaver IC, et al. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci. 2004; 2004;7(8):847–854.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
14. Kane MA, et al. Influence on immunoreactive folate-binding proteins of extracellular folate concentration in cultured human cells. J Clin Invest. 1988;81(5):1398–1406.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
15. Liu M, et al. Structure and regulation of the murine reduced folate carrier gene: identification of four noncoding exons and promoters and regulation of dietary folates. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(7):5588–5597.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
16. Rachmandani S, Bhattacharya SK, Cervoni N, Szyf M. DNA methylation is a reversible biological phenomenon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(11):6107–6112.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
17. Endres M, et al. DNA methyltransferase contributes to delayed ischemic brain injury. J Neurosci. 2000;20(9):3175–81.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
18. Chawla RK, Watson WH, Jones DP. Effect of hypoxia on hepatic DNA methylation and tRNA methyltransferase in rat: similarities to effects of methyl-deficient diets. J Cell Biochem. 1996;61(1):72–80.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
19. Cerda S, Weitzman SA. Influence of oxygen radical injury on DNA methylation. Mutat Res. 1997;386(2):141–152.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
20. Goulian M, Bleile B, Tseng BY. Methotrexate-induced misincorporation of uracil into DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980;77(4):1956–1960.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
21. Hagen L, et al. Genomic uracil and human disease. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312(14):2666–672.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
22. Shen JC, Rideout WM 3rd, Jones PA. High frequency mutagenesis by a DNA methyltransferase. Cell. 1992;71(7):1073–1080.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
23. Kronenberg G, et al. Folate deficiency induces neurodegeneration and brain dysfunction in mice lacking uracil DNA glycosylase. J Neurosci. 2008;28(28):7219–7230.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
24. Shen S, et al. Age-dependent epigenetic control of differentiation inhibitors is critical for remyelination efficiency. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11(9):1024–1034.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar