Fn-EDA (fibronectin containing extra domain A) in the plasma, but not endothelial cells, exacerbates stroke outcome by promoting thrombo-inflammation

N Dhanesha, MR Chorawala, M Jain, A Bhalla… - Stroke, 2019 - Am Heart Assoc
N Dhanesha, MR Chorawala, M Jain, A Bhalla, D Thedens, M Nayak, P Doddapattar
Stroke, 2019Am Heart Assoc
Background and Purpose—Cellular Fn-EDA (fibronectin containing extra domain A) is
expressed in activated endothelial cells and elevated in circulation in patients with
cardiovascular diseases. Although global deficiency of Fn-EDA in mice improves stroke
outcome, the specific contribution of plasma versus endothelium Fn-EDA in stroke outcome
is currently unknown. We investigated the role of plasma versus endothelial Fn-EDA in
stroke exacerbation in the comorbid condition of hyperlipidemia. Methods—We generated …
Background and Purpose
Cellular Fn-EDA (fibronectin containing extra domain A) is expressed in activated endothelial cells and elevated in circulation in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Although global deficiency of Fn-EDA in mice improves stroke outcome, the specific contribution of plasma versus endothelium Fn-EDA in stroke outcome is currently unknown. We investigated the role of plasma versus endothelial Fn-EDA in stroke exacerbation in the comorbid condition of hyperlipidemia.
Methods
We generated novel plasma Fn-EDA−/− (Fn-EDAfl/flAlbCre) and endothelial Fn-EDA−/− (Fn-EDAfl/flTie2Cre) strains on hyperlipidemic apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE−/−) background. By following the Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable guidelines, we evaluated stroke outcome in male and female mice. Susceptibility to ischemia/reperfusion injury was evaluated in 2 different models of stroke: intraluminal monofilament and embolic model on days 1, 3, and 7. Quantitative assessment of stroke outcome was evaluated by measuring infarct volume (by magnetic resonance imaging), cerebral blood flow (by laser speckle imaging), neurological and sensory-motor outcome, and postischemic thrombo-inflammation (platelet thrombi, fibrin, neutrophil, phospho-NFκB [nuclear factor κB], TNFα [tumor necrosis factor α], and IL1β [interleukin 1β]).
Results
Stroke outcome was comparable in ApoE−/−Fn-EDAfl/flTie2Cre and control ApoE−/−Fn-EDAfl/fl mice suggesting endothelial Fn-EDA does not contribute to stroke. ApoE−/−Fn-EDAfl/flAlbCre mice exhibited significantly smaller infarcts and improved neurological and sensory-motor outcome at days 1, 3, and 7 in monofilament and embolic models of stroke. Improved stroke outcome was concomitant with enhanced survival, and decreased postischemic thrombo-inflammatory response (P<0.05 versus ApoE−/−Fn-EDAfl/fl). No sex-based differences were observed. Laser speckle imaging revealed significantly improved regional cerebral blood flow at 1 hour in ApoE−/−Fn-EDAfl/flAlbCre mice suggesting plasma Fn-EDA promotes postischemic secondary thrombosis. Coinfusion of anti–Fn-EDA antibody with r-tPA (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) in ApoE−/− mice, 1 hour after embolization, improved stroke outcome with enhanced survival, and improved neurological outcome (P<0.05 versus r-tPA).
Conclusions
Genetic evidence suggests that plasma Fn-EDA exacerbates stroke outcome by promoting postischemic thrombo-inflammation. Interventions targeting plasma Fn-EDA may reduce brain damage after reperfusion.
Am Heart Assoc