Confocal laser endomicroscopy: a new gold standard for the assessment of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis

V Macé, A Ahluwalia, E Coron… - Journal of …, 2015 - Wiley Online Library
V Macé, A Ahluwalia, E Coron, M Le Rhun, A Boureille, C Bossard, JF Mosnier…
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2015Wiley Online Library
Abstract Background and Aim Endoscopic assessment of mucosal healing in ulcerative
colitis (UC) is increasingly accepted as a measure of disease activity, therapeutic goal, and
the key prognostic indicator. While regular endoscopy evaluates appearance of the mucosal
surface, confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) enables in vivo visualization of subepithelial
mucosa at 1000× magnification during ongoing endoscopy. Our aims were to determine
using CLE whether endoscopically normal appearing colonic mucosa in patients with UC in …
Background and Aim
Endoscopic assessment of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasingly accepted as a measure of disease activity, therapeutic goal, and the key prognostic indicator. While regular endoscopy evaluates appearance of the mucosal surface, confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) enables in vivo visualization of subepithelial mucosa at 1000× magnification during ongoing endoscopy. Our aims were to determine using CLE whether endoscopically normal appearing colonic mucosa in patients with UC in remission (UC‐IR) has fully regenerated mucosal structures, resolved inflammation, and to identify the mechanisms.
Methods
Twelve patients (six controls and six with UC‐IR) underwent colonoscopy using CLE and intravenous fluorescein infusion. During colonoscopy, CLE images of colonic mucosa and conventional mucosal biopsies were obtained and evaluated using image‐analysis systems. We quantified; (i) regeneration of colonic crypts and blood microvessels; (ii) cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) expression; (iii) mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations; (iv) inflammatory infiltration; and (v) vascular permeability (VP).
Results
In control subjects, CLE demonstrated normal colonic crypts and microvasculature. COX2 expression was minimal, and < 7% crypts showed mtDNA mutations. Colonic mucosa of UC‐IR patients had impaired and distorted crypt regeneration, increased COX2, 69% crypts with mtDNA mutations, persistent inflammation, and abnormal vascular architecture with increased VP (all P < 0.001 vs normal mucosa).
Conclusions
(i) Endoscopically normal appearing colonic mucosa of patients with UC‐IR remains abnormal: CLE demonstrates impaired crypt regeneration, persistent inflammation, distinct abnormalities in angioarchitecture and increased vascular permeability; molecular imaging showed increased COX2 and mtDNA mutations; (ii) CLE may serve as a new gold standard for the assessment of mucosal healing in UC.
Wiley Online Library