Safety and pharmacodynamics of suprachoroidal injection of triamcinolone acetonide as a controlled ocular drug release model

M Chen, X Li, J Liu, Y Han, L Cheng - Journal of controlled release, 2015 - Elsevier
M Chen, X Li, J Liu, Y Han, L Cheng
Journal of controlled release, 2015Elsevier
Suprachoroidal injection is an emerging technique for drug delivery to the posterior
segment, which is hard to reach by non-invasive approaches. However, the injection
technique varies and the associated ocular safety is not well understood. In addition, it is not
clear if drug formulation is a major factor in optimizing pharmacodynamics using this
technique. The current study was designed to compare the suprachoroidal injection of
different drug formulations and to characterize the safety and pharmacodynamics of …
Abstract
Suprachoroidal injection is an emerging technique for drug delivery to the posterior segment, which is hard to reach by non-invasive approaches. However, the injection technique varies and the associated ocular safety is not well understood. In addition, it is not clear if drug formulation is a major factor in optimizing pharmacodynamics using this technique. The current study was designed to compare the suprachoroidal injection of different drug formulations and to characterize the safety and pharmacodynamics of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) delivered by this technique. Both indocyanine green (ICG) solution and TA suspension, at 50 μL, 100 μL, and 150 μL, were suprachoroidally injected and intraocular pressure (IOP) tonometry, fundus photography, and electroretinography were performed over multiple time points up to eight weeks. After 50 μL TA (Kenalog-40) suprachoroidal injection, 4–5 animals at 7 time points were sacrificed for aqueous, vitreous, retina, and plasma collections. TA was quantitated using ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. For comparative efficacy study, 50 μL (2 mg) suprachoroidal TA versus 20 mg subtenon TA were performed 4 weeks before induction of experimental uveitis with 10 ng of intravitreal lipopolysaccharide. After suprachoroidal injection, IOP had an acute elevation, higher volume caused higher IOP (p < 0.0001). Equivalent volume of ICG solution led to a significantly smaller IOP elevation than after TA suprachoroidal injection. This finding suggests better distribution of ICG solution than TA suspension in the suprachoroidal space. Following a 50 μL suprachoroidal injection, peak TA concentration in the aqueous was below 1 ng/mL. In contrast, the posterior vitreous and retina had 1912 ng/mL and 400,369 ng/mL TA, respectively. Maximum TA in plasma was 11.6 ng/mL. Drug exposure to the posterior retina was 523,910 times more than that to the aqueous and 29,516 times more than systemic TA exposure. In the treatment of lipopolysaccharide-induced uveitis, compared with 20 mg subtenon injection, suprachoroidal 2 mg TA demonstrated much better efficacy with significantly less aqueous humor cells and lower vitreous opacity scores (p < 0.05). Histology showed much less vitreous inflammation in the suprachoroidal injection group (p < 0.0001). It seems that a 50 μL suprachoroidal injection of TA was well tolerated in rabbit eyes and demonstrated excellent penetration into the posterior retina, providing better therapeutic effect than subtenon 20 mg TA.
Elsevier