Identifying the binding mechanism of LEAP 2 to receptor GHSR 1a

JH Wang, HZ Li, XX Shao, WH Nie, YL Liu… - The FEBS …, 2019 - Wiley Online Library
JH Wang, HZ Li, XX Shao, WH Nie, YL Liu, ZG Xu, ZY Guo
The FEBS Journal, 2019Wiley Online Library
Liver‐expressed antimicrobial peptide 2 (LEAP 2) is a highly conserved secretory peptide
first isolated in 2003. However, its exact biological functions remained elusive until a recent
study identified it as an endogenous antagonist for the growth hormone secretagogue
receptor (GHSR 1a), a G protein‐coupled receptor for which the gastric peptide ghrelin is the
endogenous agonist. By tuning the ghrelin–GHSR 1a system, LEAP 2 has an important
function in energy metabolism. In the present study, we first demonstrated that LEAP 2 and …
Liver‐expressed antimicrobial peptide 2 (LEAP2) is a highly conserved secretory peptide first isolated in 2003. However, its exact biological functions remained elusive until a recent study identified it as an endogenous antagonist for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR1a), a G protein‐coupled receptor for which the gastric peptide ghrelin is the endogenous agonist. By tuning the ghrelin–GHSR1a system, LEAP2 has an important function in energy metabolism. In the present study, we first demonstrated that LEAP2 and ghrelin actually bound to GHSR1a in a competitive manner, rather than in a non‐competitive manner as previously reported, by binding assays and activation assays. Subsequently, we demonstrated that the antagonistic function of LEAP2 was drastically affected by the manner of its addition. LEAP2 primarily affected the maximal activation effect when added before ghrelin, whereas it primarily affected half‐maximal effective concentration when added at the same time as ghrelin. Thus, LEAP2 behaved as a competitive antagonist if added at the same time as the agonist and a non‐competitive antagonist if added before the agonist. This unusual property of LEAP2 might be caused by its slow dissociation from receptor GHSR1a. We also found that the N‐terminal fragment of LEAP2 was important for receptor binding. Our present study revealed an antagonistic mechanism for LEAP2, and will facilitate the design of novel antagonists for receptor GHSR1a in future studies.
Wiley Online Library