Efficacy of a prophylactic adjuvanted bivalent L1 virus-like-particle vaccine against infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: an interim …

J Paavonen, D Jenkins, FX Bosch, P Naud, J Salmerón… - The Lancet, 2007 - thelancet.com
J Paavonen, D Jenkins, FX Bosch, P Naud, J Salmerón, CM Wheeler, SN Chow, DL Apter…
The Lancet, 2007thelancet.com
Background The aim of this interim analysis of a large, international phase III study was to
assess the efficacy of an AS04 adjuvanted L1 virus-like-particle prophylactic candidate
vaccine against infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 in young
women. Methods 18 644 women aged 15–25 years were randomly assigned to receive
either HPV16/18 vaccine (n= 9319) or hepatitis A vaccine (n= 9325) at 0, 1, and 6 months. Of
these women, 88 were excluded because of high-grade cytology and 31 for missing …
Background
The aim of this interim analysis of a large, international phase III study was to assess the efficacy of an AS04 adjuvanted L1 virus-like-particle prophylactic candidate vaccine against infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 in young women.
Methods
18 644 women aged 15–25 years were randomly assigned to receive either HPV16/18 vaccine (n=9319) or hepatitis A vaccine (n=9325) at 0, 1, and 6 months. Of these women, 88 were excluded because of high-grade cytology and 31 for missing cytology results. Thus, 9258 women received the HPV16/18 vaccine and 9267 received the control vaccine in the total vaccinated cohort for efficacy, which included women who had prevalent oncogenic HPV infections, often with several HPV types, as well as low-grade cytological abnormalities at study entry and who received at least one vaccine dose. We assessed cervical cytology and subsequent biopsy for 14 oncogenic HPV types by PCR. The primary endpoint—vaccine efficacy against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ associated with HPV16 or HPV18—was assessed in women who were seronegative and DNA negative for the corresponding vaccine type at baseline (month 0) and allowed inclusion of lesions with several oncogenic HPV types. This interim event-defined analysis was triggered when at least 23 cases of CIN2+ with HPV16 or HPV18 DNA in the lesion were detected in the total vaccinated cohort for efficacy. Analyses were done on a modified intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with the US National Institutes of Health clinical trial registry, number NCT00122681.
Findings
Mean length of follow-up for women in the primary analysis for efficacy at the time of the interim analysis was 14ˇ8 (SD 4ˇ9) months. Two cases of CIN2+ associated with HPV16 or HPV18 DNA were seen in the HPV16/18 vaccine group; 21 were recorded in the control group. Of the 23 cases, 14 (two in the HPV16/18 vaccine group, 12 in the control group) contained several oncogenic HPV types. Vaccine efficacy against CIN2+ containing HPV16/18 DNA was 90ˇ4% (97ˇ9% CI 53ˇ4–99ˇ3; p<0ˇ0001). No clinically meaningful differences were noted in safety outcomes between the study groups.
Interpretation
The adjuvanted HPV16/18 vaccine showed prophylactic efficacy against CIN2+ associated with HPV16 or HPV18 and thus could be used for cervical cancer prevention.
thelancet.com