Randomized, double-blind, phase III trial of ipilimumab versus placebo in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with metastatic chemotherapy-naive …

TM Beer, ED Kwon, CG Drake, K Fizazi… - Journal of Clinical …, 2017 - ascopubs.org
TM Beer, ED Kwon, CG Drake, K Fizazi, C Logothetis, G Gravis, V Ganju, J Polikoff, F Saad
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2017ascopubs.org
Purpose Ipilimumab increases antitumor T-cell responses by binding to cytotoxic T-
lymphocyte antigen 4. We evaluated treatment with ipilimumab in asymptomatic or minimally
symptomatic patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate
cancer without visceral metastases. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, double-blind,
phase III trial, patients were randomly assigned (2: 1) to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo
every 3 weeks for up to four doses. Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo maintenance therapy …
Purpose
Ipilimumab increases antitumor T-cell responses by binding to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4. We evaluated treatment with ipilimumab in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer without visceral metastases.
Patients and Methods
In this multicenter, double-blind, phase III trial, patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to four doses. Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo maintenance therapy was administered to nonprogressing patients every 3 months. The primary end point was overall survival (OS).
Results
Four hundred patients were randomly assigned to ipilimumab and 202 to placebo; 399 were treated with ipilimumab and 199 with placebo. Median OS was 28.7 months (95% CI, 24.5 to 32.5 months) in the ipilimumab arm versus 29.7 months (95% CI, 26.1 to 34.2 months) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95.87% CI, 0.88 to 1.39; P = .3667). Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the ipilimumab arm versus 3.8 with placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95.87% CI, 0.55 to 0.81). Exploratory analyses showed a higher prostate-specific antigen response rate with ipilimumab (23%) than with placebo (8%). Diarrhea (15%) was the only grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event (AE) reported in ≥ 10% of ipilimumab-treated patients. Nine (2%) deaths occurred in the ipilimumab arm due to treatment-related AEs; no deaths occurred in the placebo arm. Immune-related grade 3 to 4 AEs occurred in 31% and 2% of patients, respectively.
Conclusion
Ipilimumab did not improve OS in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The observed increases in progression-free survival and prostate-specific antigen response rates suggest antitumor activity in a patient subset.
ASCO Publications