The Biology and Cytogeneticsof Multiple Myeloma

PJ Ho, LJ Campbell, J Gibson… - Reviews in clinical …, 2002 - Wiley Online Library
PJ Ho, LJ Campbell, J Gibson, R Brown, D Joshua
Reviews in clinical and experimental hematology, 2002Wiley Online Library
Despite the advances in our knowledge of myeloma cell biology, our understanding of
myeloma pathogenesis is still incomplete. In this review, we present a summary of the
cellular and molecular aspects of B‐cell development and immunoglobulin (Ig) gene
rearrangement which have been important in defining the characteristics of the myeloma
plasma cell (MPC). The PMC has undergone variable gene recombination, somatic
hypermutation and isotype switching, and is therefore at a postgerminal center stage of …
Despite the advances in our knowledge of myeloma cell biology, our understanding of myeloma pathogenesis is still incomplete. In this review, we present a summary of the cellular and molecular aspects of B‐cell development and immunoglobulin (Ig) gene rearrangement which have been important in defining the characteristics of the myeloma plasma cell (MPC). The PMC has undergone variable gene recombination, somatic hypermutation and isotype switching, and is therefore at a postgerminal center stage of development. The finding of preswitch clonal cells and isotype variants have raised interesting questions about the cell of origin of myeloma, for which no conclusive data is as yet available. However much information has been obtained about the chromosomal and genetic aberrations in myeloma, including monosomy 13, Ig heavy chain (IgH) switch region translocations, numerical abnormalities and a multitude of heterogeneous changes. A variety of techniques have been developed to overcome the insensitivity of conventional karyotyping, utilizing molecular cytogenetic strategies ranging from the delineation of precise loci by fluorescent in situ hybridization, a more “global” assessment of the genome by multicolor spectral karyotyping, to the quantitation of chromosomal material of specific origin by comparative genomic hybridization. Whether the abnormalities detected represent oncogenic insults, are involved in disease progression or are simply “by‐products” of genetic instability is still unclear. For IgH translocations, the role of candidate genes such as Cyclin D1 and FGFR3 has been studied extensively by quantitating their expression and assessment of their oncogenicity (e.g. for FGFR3) in animal models. The significance of other aberrations such as c‐myc, ras and p53 has also been investigated. With the advent of oligonucleotide microarrays, the expression of thousands of genes can be efficiently examined. So far, this approach seems promising in defining subgroups of different disease behavior, and may highlight specific genes and molecular mechanisms which are important in myeloma pathogenesis.
Wiley Online Library