[PDF][PDF] Plasticity of CD4+ T cell lineage differentiation

L Zhou, MMW Chong, DR Littman - Immunity, 2009 - cell.com
Immunity, 2009cell.com
The differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into lineages with distinct effector functions has
been considered to be an irreversible event. T helper type 1 (Th1) cells stably express IFN-γ,
whereas Th2 cells express IL-4. The discovery and investigation of two other CD4+ T cell
subsets, induced regulatory T (iTreg) cells and Th17 cells, has led to a rethinking of the
notion that helper T cell subsets represent irreversibly differentiated endpoints.
Accumulating evidence suggests that CD4+ T cells, particularly iTreg and Th17 cells, are …
The differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into lineages with distinct effector functions has been considered to be an irreversible event. T helper type 1 (Th1) cells stably express IFN-γ, whereas Th2 cells express IL-4. The discovery and investigation of two other CD4+ T cell subsets, induced regulatory T (iTreg) cells and Th17 cells, has led to a rethinking of the notion that helper T cell subsets represent irreversibly differentiated endpoints. Accumulating evidence suggests that CD4+ T cells, particularly iTreg and Th17 cells, are more plastic than previously appreciated. It appears that expression of Foxp3 by iTreg cells or IL-17 by Th17 cells may not be stable and that there is a great degree of flexibility in their differentiation options. Here, we will discuss recent findings that demonstrate the plasticity of CD4+ T cell differentiation and the biological implications of this flexibility.
cell.com