[HTML][HTML] Long-term treatment with ruxolitinib for patients with myelofibrosis: 5-year update from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMFORT-I …

S Verstovsek, RA Mesa, J Gotlib, V Gupta… - Journal of hematology & …, 2017 - Springer
S Verstovsek, RA Mesa, J Gotlib, V Gupta, JF DiPersio, JV Catalano, MWN Deininger
Journal of hematology & oncology, 2017Springer
Background The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMFORT-I trial
evaluated the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate-2/high-risk
myelofibrosis. The primary and planned 3-year analyses of COMFORT-I data demonstrated
that ruxolitinib—the first myelofibrosis-approved therapy—reduced splenomegaly and
prolonged overall survival versus placebo. Here, we present the final 5-year results.
Methods Patients managed in Australia, Canada, and the USA were randomized centrally …
Background
The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMFORT-I trial evaluated the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate-2/high-risk myelofibrosis. The primary and planned 3-year analyses of COMFORT-I data demonstrated that ruxolitinib—the first myelofibrosis-approved therapy—reduced splenomegaly and prolonged overall survival versus placebo. Here, we present the final 5-year results.
Methods
Patients managed in Australia, Canada, and the USA were randomized centrally (interactive voice response system) 1:1 to oral ruxolitinib twice daily (15 or 20 mg per baseline platelet counts) or placebo. Investigators and patients were blinded to treatment. The secondary endpoints evaluated in this analysis were durability of a ≥35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume (spleen response) and overall survival, evaluated in the intent-to-treat population. Safety was evaluated in patients who received study treatment.
Results
Patients were randomized (September 2009–April 2010) to ruxolitinib (n = 155) or placebo (n = 154). At termination, 27.7% of ruxolitinib-randomized patients and 25.2% (28/111) who crossed over from placebo were on treatment; no patients remained on placebo. Patients randomized to ruxolitinib had a median spleen response duration of 168.3 weeks and prolonged median overall survival versus placebo (ruxolitinib group, not reached; placebo group, 200 weeks; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50–0.96; P = 0.025) despite the crossover to ruxolitinib. The ruxolitinib safety profile remained consistent with previous analyses. The most common new-onset all-grade nonhematologic adverse events starting <12 versus ≥48 months after ruxolitinib initiation were fatigue (29.0 vs 33.3%) and diarrhea (27.8 vs 14.6%). New-onset grade 3 or 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia both primarily occurred within the first 6 months, with no cases after 42 months. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event-related deaths in the ruxolitinib-randomized group were sepsis (2.6%), disease progression (1.9%), and pneumonia (1.9%).
Conclusion
The final COMFORT-I results continue to support ruxolitinib as an effective treatment for patients with intermediate-2/high-risk MF.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00952289
Springer