Improving cutaneous scar formation by controlling the mechanical environment: large animal and phase I studies

GC Gurtner, RH Dauskardt, VW Wong, KA Bhatt, K Wu… - 2011 - journals.lww.com
GC Gurtner, RH Dauskardt, VW Wong, KA Bhatt, K Wu, IN Vial, K Padois, JM Korman…
2011journals.lww.com
Objective: To test the hypothesis that the mechanical environment of cutaneous wounds can
control scar formation. Background: Mechanical forces have been recognized to modulate
myriad biologic processes, but the role of physical force in scar formation remains unclear.
Furthermore, the therapeutic benefits of offloading cutaneous wounds with a device have not
been rigorously tested. Methods: A mechanomodulating polymer device was utilized to
manipulate the mechanical environment of closed cutaneous wounds in red Duroc swine …
Objective:
To test the hypothesis that the mechanical environment of cutaneous wounds can control scar formation.
Background:
Mechanical forces have been recognized to modulate myriad biologic processes, but the role of physical force in scar formation remains unclear. Furthermore, the therapeutic benefits of offloading cutaneous wounds with a device have not been rigorously tested.
Methods:
A mechanomodulating polymer device was utilized to manipulate the mechanical environment of closed cutaneous wounds in red Duroc swine. After 8 weeks, wounds subjected to different mechanical stress states underwent immunohistochemical analysis for fibrotic markers. In a phase I clinical study, 9 human patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were treated postoperatively with a stress-shielding polymer on one side whereas the other side was treated as standard of care. Professional photographs were taken between 8 and 12 months postsurgery and evaluated using a visual analog scale by lay and professional panels. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials. gov, number NCT00766727.
Results:
Stress shielding of swine incisions reduced histologic scar area by 6-and 9-fold compared to control and elevated stress states, respectively (P< 0.01 for both) and dramatically decreased the histologic expression of profibrotic markers. Closure of high-tension wounds induced human-like scar formation in the red Duroc, a phenotype effectively mitigated with stress shielding of wounds. In the study on humans, stress shielding of abdominal incisions significantly improved scar appearance (P= 0.004) compared with within-patient controls.
Conclusions:
These results indicate that mechanical manipulation of the wound environment with a dynamic stress-shielding polymer device can significantly reduce scar formation.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins