Role of the estrogen receptor coactivator AIB1 (SRC-3) and HER-2/neu in tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer

CK Osborne, V Bardou, TA Hopp… - Journal of the …, 2003 - academic.oup.com
CK Osborne, V Bardou, TA Hopp, GC Chamness, SG Hilsenbeck, SAW Fuqua, J Wong…
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2003academic.oup.com
Abstract Background: AIB1 (SRC-3) is an estrogen receptor (ER) coactivator that, when
overexpressed in cultured cells, can reduce the antagonist activity of tamoxifen-bound ERs.
Signaling through the HER-2 receptor pathway activates AIB1 by phosphorylation. To
determine whether high AIB1 expression alone or together with HER-2 reduces the
effectiveness of tamoxifen in breast cancer patients, we quantified expression of AIB1 and
HER-2 in tumors from breast cancer patients with long-term clinical follow-up who received …
Abstract
Background: AIB1 (SRC-3) is an estrogen receptor (ER) coactivator that, when overexpressed in cultured cells, can reduce the antagonist activity of tamoxifen-bound ERs. Signaling through the HER-2 receptor pathway activates AIB1 by phosphorylation. To determine whether high AIB1 expression alone or together with HER-2 reduces the effectiveness of tamoxifen in breast cancer patients, we quantified expression of AIB1 and HER-2 in tumors from breast cancer patients with long-term clinical follow-up who received either no adjuvant therapy or adjuvant tamoxifen therapy after breast cancer surgery. Methods: AIB1 and HER-2 protein levels in tumors from 316 breast cancer patients were determined using western blot analysis. Molecular variables (e.g., expression of AIB1, ER, progesterone receptor, p53, Bcl-2), tumor characteristics, and patient outcome were assessed using Spearman rank correlation. Disease-free survival (DFS) curves were derived from Kaplan–Meier estimates, and the curves were compared by log-rank tests. The effect of AIB1 on DFS adjusted for other prognostic factors was assessed by multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: High AIB1 expression in patients not receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy was associated with better prognosis and longer DFS (P = .018, log-rank test). In contrast, for patients who did receive tamoxifen therapy, high AIB1 expression was associated with worse DFS (P = .049, log-rank test), which is indicative of tamoxifen resistance. The test for interaction between AIB1 expression and tamoxifen therapy was statistically significant (P = .004). When expression of AIB1 and HER-2 were considered together, patients whose tumors expressed high levels of both AIB1 and HER-2 had worse outcomes with tamoxifen therapy than all other patients combined (P = .002, log-rank test). Conclusions: The antitumor activity of tamoxifen in patients with breast cancer may be determined, in part, by tumor levels of AIB1 and HER-2. Thus, AIB1 may be an important diagnostic and therapeutic target.
Oxford University Press