Treatment with Anakinra improves disposition index but not insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic subjects with the metabolic syndrome: a randomized, double-blind …

EJP van Asseldonk, R Stienstra… - The Journal of …, 2011 - academic.oup.com
EJP van Asseldonk, R Stienstra, TB Koenen, LAB Joosten, MG Netea, CJ Tack
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2011academic.oup.com
Context: Obesity induces low-grade inflammation that may promote the development of
insulin resistance. IL-1 is one of the key inflammatory factors. Objective: The objective of the
study was to demonstrate improvement of insulin sensitivity by blocking IL-1. Design: This
was a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Setting: The study was based on
ambulatory care. Participants: Participants included nondiabetic, obese subjects with the
metabolic syndrome. Intervention: Intervention included 150 mg anakinra sc once daily or …
Context
Obesity induces low-grade inflammation that may promote the development of insulin resistance. IL-1 is one of the key inflammatory factors.
Objective
The objective of the study was to demonstrate improvement of insulin sensitivity by blocking IL-1.
Design
This was a randomized, double-blind, crossover study.
Setting
The study was based on ambulatory care.
Participants
Participants included nondiabetic, obese subjects with the metabolic syndrome.
Intervention
Intervention included 150 mg anakinra sc once daily or matching placebo for 4 wk.
Main Outcome Measure
Insulin sensitivity as measured by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp.
Results
A total of 13 of 19 subjects completed the study. Although anakinra treatment resulted in a significantly lower level of inflammation illustrated by a reduction in circulating C-reactive protein concentrations and leukocyte numbers, insulin sensitivity was not significantly different after anakinra treatment (2.8 × 10−2 ± 0.5 × 10−2) compared with placebo treatment (2.4 × 10−2 ± 0.3 × 10−2 μmol/kg−1 · min−1 · pmol−1, P = 0.15). Adipose tissue examination, performed to analyze local effects of IL-1 receptor antagonist, showed an increased influx of macrophages after treatment with anakinra most likely due to an injection site reaction caused by the vehicle (0.28 ± 0.05 vs. 0.11 ± 0.01 macrophages per adipocyte, P = 0.005). The differences in individual subject insulin sensitivity after anakinra as compared with placebo between subjects were negatively correlated with macrophage infiltration into the adipose tissue (r2 = 0.46, P = 0.01). The disposition index increased significantly after anakinra treatment (P = 0.04), reflecting an improvement in β-cell function.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that anakinra does not improve insulin sensitivity in obese, insulin-resistant, nondiabetic subjects.
Oxford University Press