Cytogenetic and molecular aspects of gastric cancer: clinical implications

AD Panani - Cancer letters, 2008 - Elsevier
AD Panani
Cancer letters, 2008Elsevier
Gastric cancer is of major importance world-wide being the second most common cause of
cancer-related death in the world. According to Lauren's histological classification gastric
cancer is divided in two groups, the better differentiated intestinal carcinomas and the poorly
differentiated diffuse-type cancers. The genetic changes underlying the initiation and
progression of gastric cancer are not well defined. Gastric carcinogenesis is a multistep
process involving a number of genetic and epigenetic factors. Although it has been …
Gastric cancer is of major importance world-wide being the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the world. According to Lauren’s histological classification gastric cancer is divided in two groups, the better differentiated intestinal carcinomas and the poorly differentiated diffuse-type cancers. The genetic changes underlying the initiation and progression of gastric cancer are not well defined. Gastric carcinogenesis is a multistep process involving a number of genetic and epigenetic factors. Although it has been proposed that different genetic pathways exist for differentiated and undifferentiated carcinomas, the two histological subtypes of gastric cancer share some common genetic alterations. Currently, tumor histology and pathologic stage are the major prognostic variables used in the clinical practice for gastric cancer patients. However, it is known that tumors with similar morphology may differ in biological aggressiveness, prognosis and response to treatment. Molecular genetic analysis of gastric cancer revealed a number of associations of certain genetic changes with pathological features, tumor biological behavior and prognosis of gastric cancer patients, suggesting that these genetic abnormalities might play an important role in gastric tumorigenesis. Increasing evidence suggests that the molecular genetic changes could be helpful in the clinical setting, contributing to prognosis and management of patients. Regarding epigenetic events in gastric tumorigenesis, a number of methylating markers have been proposed for risk assessment, prognostic evaluation and as therapeutic targets. However, further research is required in order to systematically investigate the genetic changes in gastric cancer estimating also their usefulness in the clinical practice. A good understanding of the genetic changes underlying gastric carcinogenesis may provide new perspectives for prognosis and screening of high risk individuals. Some of the genetic alterations could definitely improve tumor classification and management of gastric cancer patients. Also, based on molecular data identified in gastric cancer novel therapeutics might help to improve the treatment of this disease.
Elsevier