cAMP sensitivity of HCN pacemaker channels determines basal heart rate but is not critical for autonomic rate control

PA Schweizer, N Duhme, D Thomas… - Circulation …, 2010 - Am Heart Assoc
PA Schweizer, N Duhme, D Thomas, R Becker, J Zehelein, A Draguhn, C Bruehl, HA Katus…
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2010Am Heart Assoc
Background—HCN channels activate the pacemaker current If, which is thought to
contribute significantly to generation and regulation of heart rhythm. HCN4 represents the
dominant isotype in the sinoatrial node and binding of cAMP was suggested to be necessary
for autonomic heart rate regulation. Methods and Results—In a candidate gene approach, a
heterozygous insertion of 13 nucleotides in exon 6 of the HCN4 gene leading to a truncated
cyclic nucleotide-binding domain was identified in a 45-year-old woman with sinus …
Background
HCN channels activate the pacemaker current If, which is thought to contribute significantly to generation and regulation of heart rhythm. HCN4 represents the dominant isotype in the sinoatrial node and binding of cAMP was suggested to be necessary for autonomic heart rate regulation.
Methods and Results
In a candidate gene approach, a heterozygous insertion of 13 nucleotides in exon 6 of the HCN4 gene leading to a truncated cyclic nucleotide-binding domain was identified in a 45-year-old woman with sinus bradycardia. Biophysical properties determined by whole-cell patch-clamp recording of HEK293 cells demonstrated that mutant subunits (HCN4-695X) were insensitive to cAMP. Heteromeric channels composed of wild-type and mutant subunits failed to respond to cAMP-like homomeric mutant channels, indicating a dominant-negative suppression of cAMP-induced channel activation by mutant subunits. Pedigree analysis identified 7 additional living carriers showing similar clinical phenotypes, that is, sinus node dysfunction with mean resting heart rate of 45.9±4.6 bpm (n=8) compared with 66.5±9.1 bpm of unaffected relatives (n=6; P<0.01). Clinical evaluation revealed no ischemic or structural heart disease in any family member. Importantly, mutant carriers exhibited normal heart rate variance and full ability to accelerate heart rate under physical activity or pharmacological stimulation. Moreover, mutant carriers displayed distinctive sinus arrhythmias and premature beats linked to adrenergic stress.
Conclusions
In humans, cAMP responsiveness of If determines basal heart rate but is not critical for maximum heart rate, heart rate variability, or chronotropic competence. Furthermore, cAMP-activated If may stabilize heart rhythm during chronotropic response.
Am Heart Assoc