[HTML][HTML] Replication of the association between variants in WFS1 and risk of type 2 diabetes in European populations

PW Franks, O Rolandsson, SL Debenham, KA Fawcett… - Diabetologia, 2008 - Springer
PW Franks, O Rolandsson, SL Debenham, KA Fawcett, F Payne, C Dina, P Froguel
Diabetologia, 2008Springer
Aims/hypothesis Mutations at the gene encoding wolframin (WFS1) cause Wolfram
syndrome, a rare neurological condition. Associations between single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs) at WFS1 and type 2 diabetes have recently been reported. Thus, our
aim was to replicate those associations in a northern Swedish case–control study of type 2
diabetes. We also performed a meta-analysis of published and previously unpublished data
from Sweden, Finland and France, to obtain updated summary effect estimates. Methods …
Aims/hypothesis
Mutations at the gene encoding wolframin (WFS1) cause Wolfram syndrome, a rare neurological condition. Associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at WFS1 and type 2 diabetes have recently been reported. Thus, our aim was to replicate those associations in a northern Swedish case–control study of type 2 diabetes. We also performed a meta-analysis of published and previously unpublished data from Sweden, Finland and France, to obtain updated summary effect estimates.
Methods
Four WFS1 SNPs (rs10010131, rs6446482, rs752854 and rs734312 [H611R]) were genotyped in a type 2 diabetes case–control study (n = 1,296/1,412) of Swedish adults. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between each WFS1 SNP and type 2 diabetes, following adjustment for age, sex and BMI. We then performed a meta-analysis of 11 studies of type 2 diabetes, comprising up to 14,139 patients and 16,109 controls, to obtain a summary effect estimate for the WFS1 variants.
Results
In the northern Swedish study, the minor allele at rs752854 was associated with reduced type 2 diabetes risk [odds ratio (OR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.75–0.96, p = 0.010]. Borderline statistical associations were observed for the remaining SNPs. The meta-analysis of the four independent replication studies for SNP rs10010131 and correlated variants showed evidence for statistical association (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82–0.93, p = 4.5 × 10−5). In an updated meta-analysis of all 11 studies, strong evidence of statistical association was also observed (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.86–0.92; p = 4.9 × 10−11).
Conclusions/interpretation
In this study of WFS1 variants and type 2 diabetes risk, we have replicated the previously reported associations between SNPs at this locus and the risk of type 2 diabetes.
Springer