Isoniazid prophylaxis for tuberculosis in HIV infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

HC Bucher, LE Griffith, GH Guyatt, P Sudre, M Naef… - Aids, 1999 - journals.lww.com
HC Bucher, LE Griffith, GH Guyatt, P Sudre, M Naef, P Sendi, M Battegay
Aids, 1999journals.lww.com
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of isoniazid for the prevention of tuberculosis in
tuberculin skin test-positive and negative individuals with HIV infection. Design: Meta-
analysis of randomized controlled trials. Setting: Seven trials from Mexico, Haiti, the United
States, Zambia, Uganda and Kenya. Patients: Individuals free from tuberculosis, 2367
persons in the intervention and 2162 in the control groups. Intervention: Comparison of
isoniazid with placebo or no prophylaxis. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was …
Abstract
Objectives:
To evaluate the efficacy of isoniazid for the prevention of tuberculosis in tuberculin skin test-positive and negative individuals with HIV infection.
Design:
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Setting:
Seven trials from Mexico, Haiti, the United States, Zambia, Uganda and Kenya.
Patients:
Individuals free from tuberculosis, 2367 persons in the intervention and 2162 in the control groups.
Intervention:
Comparison of isoniazid with placebo or no prophylaxis.
Methods:
A systematic search of the literature was carried out from 1985 to October 1997 for randomized controlled trials of isoniazid prophylaxis in HIV-infected persons. Two reviewers evaluated the relevance of each candidate study and the validity of eligible trials. Studies were pooled using a random effect model, conducting secondary analyses for tuberculin skin test-positive and negative persons.
Results:
Mean follow-up in trials varied between 0.4 and 3.2 years. Pooling all seven trials, a risk ratio was found for persons treated with isoniazid for developing tuberculosis of 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-0.80] and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.83-1.07) for death. In groups of tuberculin skin test-positive and negative persons, the risk ratio of tuberculosis was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.24-0.65) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.54-1.30), respectively, and the difference in the effectiveness of isoniazid versus placebo between these groups was statistically significant (P= 0.03, for the difference of summary estimates). Consistency of results was found across trials (P> 0.10, heterogeneity value) for all comparisons.
Conclusions:
Prophylaxis with isoniazid reduces the risk of tuberculosis in persons with HIV infection. The effect is restricted to tuberculin skin test-positive persons.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins