Dynamics of glomerular ultrafiltration: VI. Studies in the primate

DA Maddox, WM Deen, BM Brenner, JL Troy… - Kidney International, 1974 - Elsevier
DA Maddox, WM Deen, BM Brenner, JL Troy, RW Surface
Kidney International, 1974Elsevier
Dynamics of glomerular ultrafiltration: VI. Studies in the primate. Pressures and flows were
measured in accessible surface glomeruli of the squirrel monkey under conditions of normal
hydropenia. Mean glomerular capillary hydrostatic pressure and the mean glomerular
transcapillary hydrostatic pressure difference (ΔP) averaged approximately 45 mm Hg and
35 mm Hg, respectively. These findings are in close accord with recent direct estimates in
the rat. The net driving force for ultrafiltration was found to decline from a maximum value of …
Dynamics of glomerular ultrafiltration: VI. Studies in the primate. Pressures and flows were measured in accessible surface glomeruli of the squirrel monkey under conditions of normal hydropenia. Mean glomerular capillary hydrostatic pressure and the mean glomerular transcapillary hydrostatic pressure difference (ΔP) averaged approximately 45 mm Hg and 35 mm Hg, respectively. These findings are in close accord with recent direct estimates in the rat. The net driving force for ultrafiltration was found to decline from a maximum value of about 12 mm Hg at the afferent end of the glomerular capillary network essentially to zero by the efferent end, indicating that, in the monkey as in the rat, filtration pressure equilibrium is achieved under normal hydropenic conditions. The monkey differs from the rat in one important respect, however, in that, as has long been recognized, the monkey tends to have higher systemic total plasma protein concentrations (CA) than the rat. This is of interest since monkey, like man, is found to have lower filtration fractions than the rat. Since ΔP is found to be essentially similar in monkey and rat, and since, at filtration pressure equilibrium, filtration fraction is determined by ΔP and CA, these observed differences in filtration fraction between rodent and primate must therefore be due to these differences in CA.
Elsevier