High-dose methylprednisolone treatment in experimental focal cerebral ischemia

AP Slivka, EJ Murphy - Experimental Neurology, 2001 - Elsevier
AP Slivka, EJ Murphy
Experimental Neurology, 2001Elsevier
Previous studies using steroids for experimental focal stroke have demonstrated conflicting
results, possibly related to dose used or ischemic models employed. In this study we
examined high-dose methylprednisolone treatment following permanent and temporary
focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Focal stroke was induced in spontaneously hypertensive
rats by permanent right common carotid and either permanent or 3 h of temporary middle
cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. Methylprednisolone (105 mg/kg) was administered intra …
Previous studies using steroids for experimental focal stroke have demonstrated conflicting results, possibly related to dose used or ischemic models employed. In this study we examined high-dose methylprednisolone treatment following permanent and temporary focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Focal stroke was induced in spontaneously hypertensive rats by permanent right common carotid and either permanent or 3 h of temporary middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. Methylprednisolone (105 mg/kg) was administered intra-arterially. Infarct volume was measured at 24 h after permanent and temporary MCA occlusion. Cerebral edema was determined by measuring right and left hemispheric volumes and water content 24 h after permanent MCA occlusion in one experiment. Methylprednisolone, whether administered in divided doses over 12 h (n = 15 in each group) or a single bolus (n = 9 per group), had no effect on infarct volume after permanent MCA occlusion. Methylprednisolone treatment also had no influence on cerebral edema (n = 9 per group). In two different experiments, methylprednisolone given in divided doses over 12 h (n = 11, n = 25) after temporary MCA occlusion decreased infarct volume (P < 0.05) by 20% compared with saline controls (n = 10, n = 25). High dose methylprednisolone decreased infarct volume following temporary, but not permanent, focal ischemia. The benefit suggests that high dose methylprednisolone may prove useful clinically if reperfusion can be established with thrombolytic agents. Furthermore, the differential treatment effect in the setting of comparable ischemic insults implies that different modifiable biochemical processes may be present during temporary but not permanent focal ischemia, thus providing indirect evidence for reperfusion injury.
Elsevier