BACKGROUND Icotrokinra is the first and only targeted oral peptide that selectively binds the IL-23 receptor with high affinity to precisely inhibit IL-23 signaling. Icotrokinra demonstrated high rates of complete skin clearance and durable disease control in the phase IIb trial, FRONTIER-1, and its long-term extension, FRONTIER-2, in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. This study evaluated systemic and skin pharmacodynamic response of icotrokinra and its relationship to clinical response in FRONTIER participants.METHODS FRONTIER-1 participants received icotrokinra or placebo for 16 weeks. FRONTIER-2 followed participants for up to 1 year of treatment; placebo participants transitioned to icotrokinra after week 16. Systemic pharmacodynamic changes were assessed in serum through week 52. Skin pharmacodynamic changes were assessed using transcriptomic analysis of skin biopsies and protein quantification in tape-strip samples through week 16.RESULTS Icotrokinra dose-dependently reduced serum levels of the IL-23/IL-17 axis and psoriasis disease biomarkers through week 52, with maximal reductions observed with the highest 100 mg twice-daily dose. Proteomic analyses showed icotrokinra selectively blocked IL-23–driven inflammation without broader impacts on circulating proteins, including serum IL-23 levels. Sixteen weeks of icotrokinra, but not placebo, reduced expression of psoriasis-associated genes in lesional skin. Icotrokinra treatment also reduced psoriasis-relevant proteins in week 16 lesional skin tape-strips to levels comparable to nonlesional samples.CONCLUSION Icotrokinra induced a dose-dependent pharmacodynamic response, with early (week 4) and sustained (week 52) reductions in biomarkers of IL-23 pathway activation and psoriasis disease severity, which correlated with clinical response.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05223868, NCT05364554.FUNDING Johnson & Johnson.
David Strawn, James G. Krueger, Robert Bissonnette, Kilian Eyerich, Laura K. Ferris, Amy S. Paller, Andreas Pinter, Dylan Richards, Elizabeth Y. Chen, Kate Paget, Daniel Horowitz, Roohid Parast, Joshua J. Rusbuldt, Jocelyn Sendecki, Sunita Bhagat, Lynn P. Tomsho, Ching-Heng Chou, Marta E. Polak, Brice E. Keyes, Emily Bozenhardt, Yuan Xiong, Wangda Zhou, Cynthia DeKlotz, Paul Newbold, Dawn M. Waterworth, Megan Miller, Takayuki Ota, Ya-Wen Yang, Monica W.L. Leung, Lloyd S. Miller, Carolyn A. Cuff, Bradford McRae, Darren Ruane, Arun K. Kannan
Usage data is cumulative from December 2025 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 5,206 | 409 |
| 959 | 105 | |
| Figure | 1,106 | 0 |
| Table | 374 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 488 | 20 |
| Citation downloads | 308 | 0 |
| Totals | 8,441 | 534 |
| Total Views | 8,975 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.