This study was undertaken to assess the relationship between iron absorption and the concentration of duodenal iron proteins in normal subjects and patients with idiopathic hemochromatosis (IH). Biopsies were obtained endoscopically from the duodenum in 17 normal subjects, 3 of whom were mildly iron deficient, and 7 patients with untreated IH. The absorption of both heme and nonheme iron was increased in IH despite a 20-fold elevation in serum ferritin. Immunoassays using MAb were used to measure transferrin, H-rich ferritin, and L-rich ferritin in mucosal samples. Mucosal transferrin concentrations in normal subjects did not correlate with either iron status or iron absorption, indicating that mucosal transferrin plays no physiological role in iron absorption. Mucosal transferrin was significantly lower in IH, presumably because of a decrease in mucosal transferrin receptors. Mucosal H and L ferritin concentrations were directly related to body iron stores and inversely related to iron absorption in normal subjects. In IH, mucosal H and L ferritin failed to increase in parallel with the serum ferritin, but were appropriate for the level of iron absorption. The relationship of mucosal H/L ferritin in IH did not differ from that observed in normal subjects. Our findings indicate that the major abnormality in duodenal iron proteins in IH is a parallel decrease in the concentration of H- and L-rich ferritin. It is not evident whether this is the result or the cause of the absorptive abnormality.
P Whittaker, B S Skikne, A M Covell, C Flowers, A Cooke, S R Lynch, J D Cook
Usage data is cumulative from September 2023 through September 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 140 | 0 |
108 | 23 | |
Scanned page | 284 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 38 | 0 |
Totals | 570 | 27 |
Total Views | 597 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.