On the basis of different in vitro studies, we have previously suggested that the basic metabolic defect in the rare inherited disease cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis (CTX) is a lack of a hepatic mitochondrial C27-steroid 26-hydroxylase, involved in the normal biosynthesis of bile acids (1980. J. Clin. Invest. 65: 1418-1430; 1981. J. Lipid Res. 22: 191-200; 22: 632-640). In the present work, this hypothesis was tested in vivo. One patient with CTX and two control subjects received intravenously a mixture of [4-14C]7 alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one and [6 beta-3H]7 alpha,26-dihydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, steroids believed to be important precursors of chenodeoxycholic acid. The ratio between 14C and 3H in cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid isolated from bile of the CTX-patient was approximately 1/40 and 1/60 of those of the control subjects, respectively. Another patient with CTX and one control subject received a mixture of [4-14C]5 beta-cholestane-3 alpha,7 alpha-diol and [1,2-3H]5 beta-cholestane-3 alpha,7 alpha,26-triol, both possible precursors to chenodeoxycholic acid. In this case the 14C/3H ratio in cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid from the patient with CTX was 1/10 and 1/15, respectively, compared with that of the control subject. The most likely explanation for these findings is that very little of the 14C-precursors, i.e. without a 26-hydroxyl group, can be converted into cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid because of a defect of the 26-hydroxylase step. The results obtained are in accord with our previous findings in vitro. The results further underline the importance of the 26-hydroxylase pathway in the normal biosynthesis of cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid in man.
I Björkhem, O Fausa, G Hopen, H Oftebro, J I Pedersen, S Skrede
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 106 | 9 |
44 | 12 | |
Scanned page | 312 | 11 |
Citation downloads | 48 | 0 |
Totals | 510 | 32 |
Total Views | 542 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.