Available evidence indicates that serum magnesium (Mg++) levels influence the secretion rate of parathyroid hormone (PTH). Whether serum Mg++ concentrations also modify the action of PTH on its target organs has not been definitively established. The present experiments were designed to study this possibility. The effect of infusing PTH on the urinary excretion of cyclic AMP (cAMP) and PO4= was examined in five normal dogs at two different levels of serum Mg++. At normal serum Mg++ concentrations (1.89 +/- 0.14 mg/100 ml), PTH infusion increased cAMP excretion from 1.76 +/- 0.27 to 4.87 +/- 1.00 nmol/min and fractional PO4= excretion (FEPO4) from 1.58 +/- 0.36% to 23.1 +/- 2.17%. When an identical amount of PTH was given to the same dogs at a serum Mg++ of 4.36 +/- 0.20 mg/100 ml, FEPO4 increased to only 6.02+/-1.89% and cAMP from 1.31 +/- 0.23 to 1.89 +/- 0.39 nmol/min. Identical results were obtained in thyroparathyroidectomized hypermagnesemic dogs. Increased serum Mg++ levels had no effect on the phosphaturia produced by the infusion of dibutyryl cAMP to thyroparathyroidectomized dogs. In vitro studies using rat renal cortical slices revealed a progressive decrease in cAMP production in response to PTH as the Mg++ concentrations were increased in the incubation medium. The overall results indicate that hypermagnesemia inhibits the phosphaturic response to PTH by decreasing the renal production of cAMP. Plasma magnesium, therefore, may participate in a double feedback mechanism, not only controlling the release of PTH, but also altering the biological activity of the hormone at the level of the target organ.
E Slatopolsky, A Mercado, A Morrison, J Yates, S Klahr
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 193 | 17 |
46 | 15 | |
Scanned page | 257 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 52 | 0 |
Totals | 548 | 36 |
Total Views | 584 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.