Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1972;51(10):2678-2685. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107086.
Abstract
The isotopic method described previously for quantification of plasmin- 125I by disc gel electrophoresis was modified by inclusion of euglobulin precipitation to expand its applicability to plasmas containing low radioactivity of plasmin- 125I and plasminogen- 125I. It was found that the euglobulin precipitation method precipitates 72.4±2.1 (sd)% of both plasmin- 125I and plasminogen- 125I. Using this method and plasminogen- 125I as a tracer, studies were first made of the effects of heparin and ε-aminocaproic acid in dogs on plasmin- 125I generation in responese to a single injection of urokinase and to venous injury; second, of the effects of venous occlusion and thrombosis on plasmin- 125I generation; and third, in vitro studies of plasminogen- 125I affinity to fibrin and its activation in blood clots. The venous injury was produced by the damage of venous endothelium by an injection of 90% phenol and the thrombosis by a thrombin injection into an occluded vein. Heparin and ε-aminocaproic acid under the present experimental conditions inhibited about 78 and 100%, respectively of plasmin- 125I generation by the urokinase injection. Similar inhibitory effects of heparin and ε-aminocaproic acid were observed on plasmin- 125I generation in response to venous injury. The venous occlusion caused a small degree of plasmin- 125I generation, but thrombin thrombosis did not seem to stimulate the generation of plasmin- 125I. The in vitro studies showed that plasminogen- 125I does not have a specific affinity to fibrin and is incorporated into blood clots in approximately equal concentrations as those in serum during clotting processes, and that blood clots per se do not stimulate plasmin- 125I generation. These results suggest that injured veins release considerable amounts of vascular plasminogen activators into circulation and that these play an important role in thrombus dissolution in vivo.
Authors
Y. Takeda, T. R. Parkhill, M. Nakabayashi
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 93 | 1 |
| 50 | 16 | |
| Scanned page | 261 | 3 |
| Citation downloads | 49 | 0 |
| Totals | 453 | 20 |
| Total Views | 473 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)