Induction and maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplantation—Advances and controversies

SS Balani, CJ Jensen, AM Kouri… - Pediatric …, 2021 - Wiley Online Library
SS Balani, CJ Jensen, AM Kouri, SJ Kizilbash
Pediatric transplantation, 2021Wiley Online Library
Advances in immunosuppression have improved graft survival in pediatric kidney transplant
recipients; however, treatment‐related toxicities need to be balanced against the possibility
of graft rejection. Several immunosuppressive agents are available for use in transplant
recipients; however, the optimal combinations of agents remain unclear, resulting in
variations in institutional protocols. Lymphocyte‐depleting antibodies, specifically ATG, are
the most common induction agent used for pediatric kidney transplantation in the US …
Abstract
Advances in immunosuppression have improved graft survival in pediatric kidney transplant recipients; however, treatment‐related toxicities need to be balanced against the possibility of graft rejection. Several immunosuppressive agents are available for use in transplant recipients; however, the optimal combinations of agents remain unclear, resulting in variations in institutional protocols. Lymphocyte‐depleting antibodies, specifically ATG, are the most common induction agent used for pediatric kidney transplantation in the US. Basiliximab may be used for induction in immunologically low‐risk children; however, pediatric data are scarce. CNIs and antiproliferative agents (mostly Tac and mycophenolate in recent years) constitute the backbone of maintenance immunosuppression. Steroid‐avoidance maintenance regimens remain controversial. Belatacept and mTOR inhibitors are used in children under specific circumstances such as non‐adherence or CNI toxicity. This article reviews the indications, mechanism of action, efficacy, dosing, and side effect profiles of various immunosuppressive agents available for pediatric kidney transplantation.
Wiley Online Library