[HTML][HTML] Detecting autozygosity through runs of homozygosity: a comparison of three autozygosity detection algorithms
DP Howrigan, MA Simonson, MC Keller - BMC genomics, 2011 - Springer
DP Howrigan, MA Simonson, MC Keller
BMC genomics, 2011•SpringerBackground A central aim for studying runs of homozygosity (ROHs) in genome-wide SNP
data is to detect the effects of autozygosity (stretches of the two homologous chromosomes
within the same individual that are identical by descent) on phenotypes. However, it is
unknown which current ROH detection program, and which set of parameters within a given
program, is optimal for differentiating ROHs that are truly autozygous from ROHs that are
homozygous at the marker level but vary at unmeasured variants between the markers …
data is to detect the effects of autozygosity (stretches of the two homologous chromosomes
within the same individual that are identical by descent) on phenotypes. However, it is
unknown which current ROH detection program, and which set of parameters within a given
program, is optimal for differentiating ROHs that are truly autozygous from ROHs that are
homozygous at the marker level but vary at unmeasured variants between the markers …
Background
A central aim for studying runs of homozygosity (ROHs) in genome-wide SNP data is to detect the effects of autozygosity (stretches of the two homologous chromosomes within the same individual that are identical by descent) on phenotypes. However, it is unknown which current ROH detection program, and which set of parameters within a given program, is optimal for differentiating ROHs that are truly autozygous from ROHs that are homozygous at the marker level but vary at unmeasured variants between the markers.
Method
We simulated 120 Mb of sequence data in order to know the true state of autozygosity. We then extracted common variants from this sequence to mimic the properties of SNP platforms and performed ROH analyses using three popular ROH detection programs, PLINK, GERMLINE, and BEAGLE. We varied detection thresholds for each program (e.g., prior probabilities, lengths of ROHs) to understand their effects on detecting known autozygosity.
Results
Within the optimal thresholds for each program, PLINK outperformed GERMLINE and BEAGLE in detecting autozygosity from distant common ancestors. PLINK's sliding window algorithm worked best when using SNP data pruned for linkage disequilibrium (LD).
Conclusion
Our results provide both general and specific recommendations for maximizing autozygosity detection in genome-wide SNP data, and should apply equally well to research on whole-genome autozygosity burden or to research on whether specific autozygous regions are predictive using association mapping methods.
Springer