[PDF][PDF] Identification and characterization of enhancers controlling the inflammatory gene expression program in macrophages

S Ghisletti, I Barozzi, F Mietton, S Polletti, F De Santa… - Immunity, 2010 - cell.com
S Ghisletti, I Barozzi, F Mietton, S Polletti, F De Santa, E Venturini, L Gregory, L Lonie…
Immunity, 2010cell.com
Enhancers determine tissue-specific gene expression programs. Enhancers are marked by
high histone H3 lysine 4 mono-methylation (H3K4me1) and by the acetyl-transferase p300,
which has allowed genome-wide enhancer identification. However, the regulatory principles
by which subsets of enhancers become active in specific developmental and/or
environmental contexts are unknown. We exploited inducible p300 binding to chromatin to
identify, and then mechanistically dissect, enhancers controlling endotoxin-stimulated gene …
Summary
Enhancers determine tissue-specific gene expression programs. Enhancers are marked by high histone H3 lysine 4 mono-methylation (H3K4me1) and by the acetyl-transferase p300, which has allowed genome-wide enhancer identification. However, the regulatory principles by which subsets of enhancers become active in specific developmental and/or environmental contexts are unknown. We exploited inducible p300 binding to chromatin to identify, and then mechanistically dissect, enhancers controlling endotoxin-stimulated gene expression in macrophages. In these enhancers, binding sites for the lineage-restricted and constitutive Ets protein PU.1 coexisted with those for ubiquitous stress-inducible transcription factors such as NF-κB, IRF, and AP-1. PU.1 was required for maintaining H3K4me1 at macrophage-specific enhancers. Reciprocally, ectopic expression of PU.1 reactivated these enhancers in fibroblasts. Thus, the combinatorial assembly of tissue- and signal-specific transcription factors determines the activity of a distinct group of enhancers. We suggest that this may represent a general paradigm in tissue-restricted and stimulus-responsive gene regulation.
cell.com