Physiological features of the S-and M-cone photoreceptors of wild-type mice from single-cell recordings

SS Nikonov, R Kholodenko, J Lem… - The Journal of general …, 2006 - rupress.org
SS Nikonov, R Kholodenko, J Lem, EN Pugh Jr
The Journal of general physiology, 2006rupress.org
Cone cells constitute only 3% of the photoreceptors of the wild-type (WT) mouse. While
mouse rods have been thoroughly investigated with suction pipette recordings of their outer
segment membrane currents, to date no recordings from WT cones have been published,
likely because of the rarity of cones and the fragility of their outer segments. Recently, we
characterized the photoreceptors of Nrl−/− mice, using suction pipette recordings from their
“inner segments”(perinuclear region), and found them to be cones. Here we report the use of …
Cone cells constitute only 3% of the photoreceptors of the wild-type (WT) mouse. While mouse rods have been thoroughly investigated with suction pipette recordings of their outer segment membrane currents, to date no recordings from WT cones have been published, likely because of the rarity of cones and the fragility of their outer segments. Recently, we characterized the photoreceptors of Nrl/ mice, using suction pipette recordings from their “inner segments” (perinuclear region), and found them to be cones. Here we report the use of this same method to record for the first time the responses of single cones of WT mice, and of mice lacking the α-subunit of the G-protein transducin (Gtα/), a loss that renders them functionally rodless. Most cones were found to functionally co-express both S- (λmax = 360 nm) and M- (λmax = 508 nm) cone opsins and to be maximally sensitive at 360 nm (“S-cones”); nonetheless, all cones from the dorsal retina were found to be maximally sensitive at 508 nm (“M-cones”). The dim-flash response kinetics and absolute sensitivity of S- and M-cones were very similar and not dependent on which of the coexpressed cone opsins drove transduction; the time to peak of the dim-flash response was ∼70 ms, and ∼0.2% of the circulating current was suppressed per photoisomerization. Amplification in WT cones (A ∼4 s−2) was found to be about twofold lower than in rods (A ∼8 s−2). Mouse M-cones maintained their circulating current at very nearly the dark adapted level even when >90% of their M-opsin was bleached. S-cones were less tolerant to bleached S-opsin than M-cones to bleached M-opsin, but still far more tolerant than mouse rods to bleached rhodopsin, which exhibit persistent suppression of nearly 50% of their circulating current following a 20% bleach. Thus, the three types of mouse opsin appear distinctive in the degree to which their bleached, unregenerated opsins generate “dark light.”
rupress.org