Plasma Cannabinoid Pharmacokinetics following Controlled Oral Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Oromucosal Cannabis Extract Administration

EL Karschner, WD Darwin, RS Goodwin… - Clinical …, 2011 - academic.oup.com
EL Karschner, WD Darwin, RS Goodwin, S Wright, MA Huestis
Clinical chemistry, 2011academic.oup.com
BACKGROUND Sativex®, a cannabis extract oromucosal spray containing Δ9-
tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), is currently in phase III trials as an
adjunct to opioids for cancer pain treatment, and recently received United Kingdom approval
for treatment of spasticity. There are indications that CBD modulates THC's effects, but it is
unclear if this is due to a pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interaction. METHODS
Cannabis smokers provided written informed consent to participate in this randomized …
BACKGROUND
Sativex®, a cannabis extract oromucosal spray containing Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), is currently in phase III trials as an adjunct to opioids for cancer pain treatment, and recently received United Kingdom approval for treatment of spasticity. There are indications that CBD modulates THC's effects, but it is unclear if this is due to a pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interaction.
METHODS
Cannabis smokers provided written informed consent to participate in this randomized, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy institutional review board–approved study. Participants received 5 and 15 mg synthetic oral THC, low-dose (5.4 mg THC and 5.0 mg CBD) and high-dose (16.2 mg THC and 15.0 mg CBD) Sativex, and placebo over 5 sessions. CBD, THC, 11-hydroxy-THC, and 11-nor- 9-carboxy-THC were quantified in plasma by 2-dimensional GC-MS. Lower limits of quantification were ≤0.25 μg/L.
RESULTS
Nine cannabis smokers completed all 5 dosing sessions. Significant differences (P < 0.05) in maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) and areas under the curve from 0–10.5 h postdose (AUC0→10.5) for all analytes were found between low and high doses of synthetic THC and Sativex. There were no statistically significant differences in Cmax, time to maximum concentration or in the AUC0→10.5 between similar oral THC and Sativex doses. Relative bioavailability was calculated to determine the relative rate and extent of THC absorption; 5 and 15 mg oral THC bioavailability was 92.6% (13.1%) and 98.8% (11.0%) of low- and high-dose Sativex, respectively.
CONCLUSION
These data suggest that CBD modulation of THC's effects is not due to a pharmacokinetic interaction at these therapeutic doses.
Oxford University Press