Insulin resistance of protein metabolism in type 2 diabetes

S Pereira, EB Marliss, JA Morais, S Chevalier… - Diabetes, 2008 - Am Diabetes Assoc
S Pereira, EB Marliss, JA Morais, S Chevalier, R Gougeon
Diabetes, 2008Am Diabetes Assoc
OBJECTIVE—We previously demonstrated that 1) obesity impairs and 2) sex influences
insulin sensitivity of protein metabolism, while 3) poor glycemic control in type 2 diabetes
accelerates protein turnover in daily fed-fasted states. We hypothesized that type 2 diabetes
alters the insulin sensitivity of protein metabolism and that sex modulates it. RESEARCH
DESIGN AND METHODS—Hyperinsulinemic (∼ 570 pmol/l), euglycemic (5.5 mmol/l), and
isoaminoacidemic (kept at postabsorptive concentrations) clamps were performed in 17 …
OBJECTIVE—We previously demonstrated that 1) obesity impairs and 2) sex influences insulin sensitivity of protein metabolism, while 3) poor glycemic control in type 2 diabetes accelerates protein turnover in daily fed-fasted states. We hypothesized that type 2 diabetes alters the insulin sensitivity of protein metabolism and that sex modulates it.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Hyperinsulinemic (∼570 pmol/l), euglycemic (5.5 mmol/l), and isoaminoacidemic (kept at postabsorptive concentrations) clamps were performed in 17 hyperglycemic type 2 diabetic subjects and 23 subjects without diabetes matched for age and body composition, after 7 days on a inpatient, protein-controlled, isoenergetic diet. Glucose and leucine kinetics were determined using tracers.
RESULTS—In type 2 diabetes, postabsorptive (baseline) glycemia was 8–9 mmol/l, glucose production (Ra) and disposal (Rd) were elevated, and once clamped, endogenous glucose Ra remained greater and Rd was less (P < 0.05) than in control subjects. Baseline leucine kinetics did not differ despite higher insulin levels. The latter was an independent predictor of leucine flux within each sex. With clamp, total flux increased less (P = 0.016) in type 2 diabetic men, although protein breakdown decreased equally (∼20%) in male groups but less in female groups. Whereas protein synthesis increased in male control subjects and in both female groups, it did not in male subjects with type 2 diabetes. In men, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance predicted 44%, and, in women, waist-to-hip ratio predicted 40% of the change in synthesis.
CONCLUSIONS—During our clamp, men with type 2 diabetes have greater insulin resistance of protein metabolism than that conferred by excess adiposity itself, whereas women do not. These results may have implications for dietary protein requirements.
Am Diabetes Assoc