Inflammatory/antiinflammatory properties of high-density lipoprotein distinguish patients from control subjects better than high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels …

BJ Ansell, M Navab, S Hama, N Kamranpour… - Circulation, 2003 - Am Heart Assoc
BJ Ansell, M Navab, S Hama, N Kamranpour, G Fonarow, G Hough, S Rahmani…
Circulation, 2003Am Heart Assoc
Background—The inflammatory/antiinflammatory properties of HDL were compared with
HDL cholesterol in 2 groups of patients and in age-and sex-matched control subjects.
Methods and Results—Group 1 consisted of 26 patients not yet taking a statin who
presented with coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD equivalents by National Cholesterol
Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria studied before and 6 weeks after 40
mg/d of simvastatin. Group 2 consisted of 20 patients with documented CHD and HDL …
Background— The inflammatory/antiinflammatory properties of HDL were compared with HDL cholesterol in 2 groups of patients and in age- and sex-matched control subjects.
Methods and Results— Group 1 consisted of 26 patients not yet taking a statin who presented with coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD equivalents by National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria studied before and 6 weeks after 40 mg/d of simvastatin. Group 2 consisted of 20 patients with documented CHD and HDL cholesterol ≥84 mg/dL. The inflammatory/antiinflammatory properties of HDL were determined by the ability of the subject’s HDL to alter LDL-induced monocyte chemotactic activity (MCA) in a human artery wall coculture. Induction of MCA by a control LDL was determined in the absence or presence of the subject’s HDL. Values in the absence of HDL were normalized to 1.0. Values >1.0 after the addition of HDL indicated proinflammatory HDL; values <1.0 indicated antiinflammatory HDL. Group 1 values before simvastatin were LDL cholesterol, 118±24 mg/dL; HDL cholesterol, 57±13 mg/dL; triglycerides, 125±64 mg/dL; and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), 1.7±1.9 mg/L; and MCA values were 1.38±0.91, compared with 0.38±0.14 for control subjects (P=1.5×10−5). After simvastatin, values were LDL cholesterol, 73±24 mg/dL; HDL cholesterol, 61±14 mg/dL; triglycerides, 99±52 mg/dL; and hs-CRP, 1.3±1.3 mg/L; and MCA values were 1.08±0.71. In group 2, values were LDL cholesterol, 108±34 mg/dL; HDL cholesterol, 95±14 mg/dL; triglycerides, 89±44 mg/dL; and hs-CRP, 0.8±0.7 mg/L; and MCA values were 1.28±0.29, compared with 0.35±0.11 for control subjects (P=1.7×10−14). Similar results were obtained with the cell-free assay.
Conclusions— The inflammatory/antiinflammatory properties of HDL distinguished patients from control subjects better than HDL cholesterol and were improved with simvastatin.
Am Heart Assoc