Is β-galactosidase staining a marker of senescence in vitro and in vivo?

J Severino, RG Allen, S Balin, A Balin… - Experimental cell …, 2000 - Elsevier
J Severino, RG Allen, S Balin, A Balin, VJ Cristofalo
Experimental cell research, 2000Elsevier
Cytochemically detectable β-galactosidase (β-gal) at pH 6.0 has been reported to increase
during the replicative senescence of fibroblast cultures and has been used widely as a
marker of cellular senescence in vivo and in vitro. In this study, we have characterized
changes in senescence-associated (SA) β-gal staining in early and late passage cultures,
cultures established from donors of different ages, virally immortalized cells, and tissue
slices obtained from donors of different ages. The effects of different culture conditions were …
Cytochemically detectable β-galactosidase (β-gal) at pH 6.0 has been reported to increase during the replicative senescence of fibroblast cultures and has been used widely as a marker of cellular senescence in vivo and in vitro. In this study, we have characterized changes in senescence-associated (SA) β-gal staining in early and late passage cultures, cultures established from donors of different ages, virally immortalized cells, and tissue slices obtained from donors of different ages. The effects of different culture conditions were also examined. While we confirm the previous report that SA β-gal staining increased in low-density cultures of proliferatively senescent cells, we were unable to demonstrate that it is a specific marker for aging in vitro. Cultures established from donors of different ages stained for SA β-gal activity as a function of in vitro replicative age, not donor age. We also failed to observe any differences in SA β-gal staining in skin cells in situ as a marker of aging in vivo. The level of cytochemically detectable SA β-gal was elevated in confluent nontransformed fibroblast cultures, in immortal fibroblast cultures that had reached a high cell density, and in low-density, young, normal cultures oxidatively challenged by treatment with H2O2. Although we clearly demonstrate that SA β-gal staining in cells is increased under a variety of different conditions, the interpretation of increased staining remains unclear, as does the question of whether the same mechanisms are responsible for the increased SA β-gal staining observed in senescent cells and changes observed in cells under other conditions.
Elsevier