Role for protease activity in visceral pain in irritable bowel syndrome
J. Clin. Invest. Nicolas Cenac, et al. 117:636 doi:10.1172/JCI29255 [
Go to this article.]

Figure 6Visceral sensitivity in response to human colonic biopsy supernatants. Recordings of mouse abdominal muscle contraction in response to colorectal distension before (control) or 6 hours after intracolonic administration of ascending colon biopsy supernatants from IBS patients (
A and
B) or control patients (filled triangles in
C). (
A) Representative traces of mouse abdominal muscle contractions in response to 60 mmHg colorectal distension, in
PAR2+/+ or
PAR2–/– mice before (control) or after intracolonic (i.c.) administration of IBS ascending colon biopsy supernatant alone or in combination with the protease inhibitor FUT or a PAR
2 antagonist. (
B) Abdominal contraction responses to different pressures of distension (15–60 mmHg) before (time 0) or after intracolonic administration of IBS patient ascending colon biopsy supernatants. Data are mean ± SEM;
n = 8. *
P < 0.05, **
P < 0.01, ***
P < 0.005 compared with basal (time 0) measurements. (
C) Mouse abdominal contraction response to increasing pressures of distension in
PAR2+/+ or
PAR2–/– mice before (control distension) or 6 hours after intracolonic administration of IBS biopsy supernatants (filled squares) alone or in combination with the protease inhibitor FUT or a PAR
2 antagonist or after the intracolonic administration of biopsy supernatants from control patients (filled triangles). Data are mean ± SEM;
n = 12 for the biopsy supernatants from control patients;
n = 18 for IBS biopsy supernatants. *
P < 0.05, **
P < 0.01, ***
P < 0.005 compared with control distension. For all data in this figure, biopsies were collected from the ascending colon.