Met-regulated expression signature defines a subset of human hepatocellular carcinomas with poor prognosis and aggressive phenotype
J. Clin. Invest. Pal Kaposi-Novak, et al. 116:1582 doi:10.1172/JCI27236 [
Go to this article.]

Figure 4Expression profiles of the Met-regulated genes in HCCs from the LEC data set. (
A) Hierarchical cluster analysis of mouse hepatocyte samples and 139 HCCs from the LEC data set. Clustering was performed with 440 common orthologous genes that showed HGF/Met–regulated expression pattern in mouse hepatocytes. Normalized log
2-transformed expression ratios are presented in a matrix where columns and rows represent individual genes and samples, respectively. (
B) Dendrogram of cluster analysis indicates the presence of an HCC subset (Met
+ group) in which the expression pattern of Met-regulated genes is similar to that in the HGF-treated WT hepatocyte samples. HCC samples in the Met
– group and
Met KO hepatocytes do not share the same gene expression pattern of Met activation. The figure also shows distribution of HCC samples between the previously described (
37) worse-prognosis (cluster A) and better-prognosis (cluster B) tumor groups.